Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add taproot multiSign to example list #2125

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

jasonandjay
Copy link
Member

  • taproot OP_CHECKSIG script-path
  • taproot OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY script-path
  • taproot OP_CHECKSIGADD script-path

@jasonandjay
Copy link
Member Author

When CI performs audit, a new case 1098094 will be encountered

Mocha has upgraded brace to 3.0.3 to solve these problems

So I upgraded mocha and removed the previous 1097496 temporary solution

README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 128 to 131
- [Taproot Key Spend](https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts#L20-L218)
- [Create (and broadcast via 3PBP) a taproot script-path spend Transaction - OP_CHECKSIG](https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts#L220-L337)
- [Create (and broadcast via 3PBP) a taproot script-path spend Transaction - OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY](https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts#L339-L441)
- [Create (and broadcast via 3PBP) a taproot script-path spend Transaction - OP_CHECKSIGADD (3-of-3)](https://github.com/bitcoinjs/bitcoinjs-lib/blob/master/test/integration/taproot.spec.ts#L443-L529)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These line numbers might change. When creating line links it needs to point to a stable branch or commit hash.

I would rather just remove the line numbers. People can search within the page.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, line numbers can bring convenience with more maintenance costs.

@junderw junderw merged commit 5909559 into bitcoinjs:master Jul 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@jasonandjay jasonandjay deleted the typos branch July 31, 2024 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants