-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BIP Draft for Octojoin #1669
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
BIP Draft for Octojoin #1669
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
b03f800
to
a0dc7f5
Compare
a0dc7f5
to
c52c746
Compare
bar [125, 143, 157, 130, 117, 106, 121, 123, 127] | ||
</source> | ||
|
||
Transactions that already use 3 inputs and 2 outputs will serve as the anonymity set for octojoin transactions with default values. It is possible to change defaults and use more number of inputs and outputs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Transactions that already use 3 inputs and 2 outputs will serve as the anonymity set for octojoin transactions with default values. It is possible to change defaults and use more number of inputs and outputs. | |
Transactions that already use 3 inputs and 2 outputs will serve as the anonymity set for octojoin transactions with default values. It is possible to change defaults and use a higher number of inputs and outputs. |
|
||
====Swapped UTXOs==== | ||
|
||
Swapping UTXOs off-chain will obscure the transaction's input ownership and history. It also adds more noise on-chain to make chain analysis difficult |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Swapping UTXOs off-chain will obscure the transaction's input ownership and history. It also adds more noise on-chain to make chain analysis difficult | |
Swapping UTXOs off-chain will obscure the transaction's input ownership and history. It also adds more noise on-chain to make chain analysis difficult. |
|
||
====Silent Payment Addresses==== | ||
|
||
Sender pay require more than 1 output so silent payment addresses will be the best approach to generate new addresses with no interaction and maximum privacy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Sender pay require more than 1 output" -> seems unclear, and isn't this always the case in a transaction, if I'm not confused
I had written a blog post about the concept and it was shared on mailing list in July 2024. There wasn't any response on mailing list but I have discussed it with some developers and there seems to be lot of interest for the idea among users.
This is an initial draft and the pull request will help me complete the BIP ASAP.
TODO