Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always return Elixir exception even there is no Zig stack trace #40

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

jackalcooper
Copy link
Contributor

@jackalcooper jackalcooper commented Jan 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling logic to enhance code clarity and maintainability.
    • Simplified exception generation and raising mechanisms.
    • Resolved potential scoping issues in error trace handling.
  • Chores
    • Updated CI configuration to run on Ubuntu 22.04 for improved environment consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies error handling logic in the src/beam.zig file, specifically focusing on the make_exception and raise_exception functions. The changes improve the clarity and maintainability of exception handling by restructuring variable declarations and simplifying conditional logic. The modifications ensure that stack trace variables are consistently accessible and reduce the complexity of error trace processing. Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow for Elixir CI is updated to run on Ubuntu 22.04 instead of the latest version.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/beam.zig - Restructured make_exception function to declare stack_trace at broader scope
- Simplified error trace handling logic
- Streamlined raise_exception function to directly return exception result
.github/workflows/elixir.yml - Updated runs-on configuration from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-22.04 in CI workflow

Poem

🐰 In the realm of Zig, where errors dance and play,
A rabbit hops through code, refactoring the way,
Traces now flow smoother, conditions untwined,
Exception handling, elegantly redesigned!
Hop, hop, hurray! 🎉


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/beam.zig (1)

1376-1385: LGTM! Consider using a more standard environment variable name.

The stack trace handling logic is well-structured with proper fallbacks. However, the environment variable name KINDA_DUMP_STACK_TRACE could be more standardized.

Consider renaming the environment variable to something more conventional like BEAM_DUMP_STACK_TRACE or ZIG_DUMP_STACK_TRACE:

-        if (std.posix.getenv("KINDA_DUMP_STACK_TRACE")) |KINDA_DUMP_STACK_TRACE| {
-            if (std.mem.eql(u8, KINDA_DUMP_STACK_TRACE, "1")) {
+        if (std.posix.getenv("ZIG_DUMP_STACK_TRACE")) |ZIG_DUMP_STACK_TRACE| {
+            if (std.mem.eql(u8, ZIG_DUMP_STACK_TRACE, "1")) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d86fad and 23a5f2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/beam.zig (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: otp25.0-ex1.18.0 / ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: otp25.0-ex1.16.2 / ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: otp25.0-ex1.13.0 / ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/beam.zig (1)

1400-1400: LGTM! Clean and straightforward implementation.

The exception raising logic is simple and correctly uses the BEAM's native exception mechanism.

src/beam.zig Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/elixir.yml (1)

24-24: Good choice pinning the Ubuntu version!

Pinning to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS improves CI stability and reproducibility by preventing unexpected issues from automatic updates. Consider:

  1. Adding a comment explaining why the version is pinned
  2. Setting up a reminder (e.g., GitHub issue) to periodically review and update the Ubuntu version
        runs-on: [
-         "ubuntu-22.04"
+         # Pinned to LTS version for stability and reproducibility
+         "ubuntu-22.04"  # TODO: Review and update periodically
        ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23a5f2c and a326b62.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/elixir.yml (1 hunks)

@jackalcooper jackalcooper merged commit aa46ec8 into main Jan 15, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant