Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert process_grib bdd to vanilla pytest #4037

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dgboss
Copy link
Collaborator

@dgboss dgboss commented Oct 22, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.99%. Comparing base (71b9a23) to head (7a2e132).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4037      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.51%   79.99%   -0.52%     
==========================================
  Files         303      303              
  Lines       11554    11554              
  Branches      549      549              
==========================================
- Hits         9303     9243      -60     
+ Misses       2133     2126       -7     
- Partials      118      185      +67     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dgboss dgboss closed this Oct 22, 2024
@dgboss dgboss reopened this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Copy link
Collaborator

@conbrad conbrad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@dgboss dgboss merged commit b4fe5e8 into main Oct 23, 2024
23 checks passed
@dgboss dgboss deleted the task/process-grib-bdd/4014 branch October 23, 2024 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants