-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Sources to API #18
Conversation
cec1af4
to
e4f6ebf
Compare
Adds a missing schema reference for the Flow schema so that it appears in rendered documentation
e4f6ebf
to
5a81a5d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor thought about using Flow IDs not being at odds with the model, but otherwise LGTM
This implementation diverges from NMOS in some ways such as the exclusion of the high level media type (e.g. audio/video/mux/data) from the Source metadata. I'd suggest that unless we have a specific reason to diverge, we should build on previous work and include that metadata. |
a638608
to
0800e3a
Compare
ADR document updated with discussion outcomes from Tuesday's session - I'll request re-review before merge |
Substantial changes made following discussion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A suggestion to remove the (manual) API version change and otherwise LGTM.
Adds details of workshop discussions to Sources ADR, along with a new Option 1a for the conclusion of that discussion: that it should be accepted without the Source graph/hierarchy piece.
Removes the `contains` and `contributes_to` properties of the Sources proposal (for ADR-0002) pending further consideration, that were added by c406e99. Makes corresponding change to documentation.
cf23998
to
3128339
Compare
Details
Pivotal Story (if relevant)
Story URL: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/186711160
Related PRs
Followed by #19
Submitter PR Checks
(tick as appropriate)
Reviewer PR Checks
(tick as appropriate)
Info on PRs
The checks above are guidelines. They don't all have to be ticked, but they should all have been considered.