Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Correct handling of q in SUR constraints #634

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bashtage
Copy link
Owner

@bashtage bashtage commented Jan 8, 2025

Correct reindexing of q so that NaN is not introduced

closes #633

Correct reindexing of q so that NaN is not introduced

closes #633
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (1969b5b) to head (fffcae3).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #634   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.59%   99.59%           
=======================================
  Files          99       99           
  Lines       17268    17290   +22     
  Branches     1443     1443           
=======================================
+ Hits        17198    17220   +22     
  Misses         26       26           
  Partials       44       44           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bashtage bashtage merged commit 9b3b559 into main Jan 8, 2025
27 checks passed
@bashtage bashtage deleted the fix-sur-constraint-r-q branch January 8, 2025 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error in SUR with a constraint if q is used
1 participant