Notion schema fix and Cron schedule change #2793
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the addition of a new constant Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
services/workflows-service/src/rule-engine/risk-rule.service.intg.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-46: Consider adding tests for the new 'high' risk level.The AI summary mentions that a new 'high' risk level was added to the
NotionRiskRuleRecordSchema. However, the existing tests in this file don't appear to cover this new risk level explicitly.Consider adding a new test case to validate the behavior of the
findAllmethod when dealing with records that have the 'high' risk level. This will ensure that the new risk level is properly handled and validated.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- packages/common/src/rule-engine/operators/enums.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/common/src/rule-engine/rules/schemas.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/workflow-core/src/lib/plugins/common-plugin/types.ts (1 hunks)
- services/workflows-service/prisma/data-migrations (1 hunks)
- services/workflows-service/src/rule-engine/risk-rule.service.intg.test.ts (1 hunks)
- services/workflows-service/src/rule-engine/risk-rule.service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/workflows-service/src/workflow/cron/ongoing-monitoring.cron.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- services/workflows-service/prisma/data-migrations
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/common/src/rule-engine/operators/enums.ts (2)
28-28: LGTM: New operation added to OPERATIONS array.The
IN_CASE_INSENSITIVEoperation has been correctly added to theOPERATIONSarray, maintaining consistency between theOPERATIONobject and theOPERATIONSarray.
12-12: LGTM: New case-insensitive operation added.The addition of
IN_CASE_INSENSITIVEto theOPERATIONobject is consistent with the existing pattern and naming convention. This new operation will likely enable case-insensitive matching in the rule engine.To ensure this change is properly integrated, let's verify its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: New case-insensitive operation is properly integrated.
The
IN_CASE_INSENSITIVEoperation is correctly added to theOPERATIONobject and is actively used in theschemas.tsfile. This ensures that case-insensitive matching is effectively supported in the rule engine.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE operation # Expected: Find references to this new operation in other parts of the codebase rg "IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE" --type tsLength of output: 320
packages/common/src/rule-engine/rules/schemas.ts (3)
83-87: LGTM! New operator enhances rule engine capabilities.The addition of the IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE operator to the RuleSchema expands the rule engine's capabilities to handle case-insensitive operations.
Please ensure that this new operator is properly handled in the rule engine implementation. Run the following script to check for its usage and implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check implementation and usage of IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE operator # Test: Search for IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE usage in the codebase echo "Searching for IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE usage:" rg -A 5 'IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE' # Test: Check for any switch statements or if-else blocks that should include this new operator echo "Checking for switch statements or if-else blocks that might need updating:" ast-grep --pattern $'switch ($_) { $$$ }' | rg -A 10 'OPERATION|operator' ast-grep --pattern $'if ($_ === OPERATION.$_) { $$$ } else if' | rg -A 10 'OPERATION|operator'
5-6: LGTM! Centralized imports improve maintainability.The change to import OPERATION, OPERATOR, and other schemas directly from '@/rule-engine' centralizes the imports and potentially improves maintainability.
Please verify that '@/rule-engine' is correctly configured in the project. Run the following script to check the import path:
Also applies to: 13-13
15-17: LGTM! Function refactoring aligns with modern practices.The refactoring of
getValuesto an arrow function improves code consistency with modern JavaScript practices.Please verify that this change doesn't affect any code relying on hoisting of the
getValuesfunction. Run the following script to check its usage:✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Function refactoring aligns with modern practices.
The refactoring of
getValuesto an arrow function maintains functionality and ensures consistency within the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of getValues function # Test: Search for getValues usage in the codebase rg -A 5 'getValues\s*\('Length of output: 1777
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the getValues function in the codebase # Search for getValues function calls rg -A 5 'getValues\s*\('Length of output: 902
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for getValues function usage in the codebase # Search for getValues function definitions and calls using word boundaries rg --word-regexp 'getValues\b' -A 5Length of output: 1418
packages/workflow-core/src/lib/plugins/common-plugin/types.ts (1)
78-78: LGTM! Verify impact on dependent systems.The addition of 'high' to the
riskLeveltype provides more granularity in risk assessment, which is a positive change. However, ensure that all systems consuming this risk level information are updated to handle the new 'high' value correctly.To verify the impact, run the following script:
Please review the output to ensure all occurrences are updated to handle the new 'high' risk level.
✅ Verification successful
Verified Impact on Dependent Systems
The addition of 'high' to the
riskLeveltype has been thoroughly reviewed across the codebase. All usages ofriskLevelalready account for the 'high' value, ensuring no issues with dependent systems.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of riskLevel in the codebase # Expected result: List of files using riskLevel, to be manually reviewed for necessary updates # Search for riskLevel usage echo "Files using riskLevel:" rg "riskLevel" --type ts # Search for specific risk level values echo "\nFiles using specific risk level values:" rg -e "'critical'" -e "'high'" -e "'moderate'" -e "'positive'" --type tsLength of output: 19942
services/workflows-service/src/workflow/cron/ongoing-monitoring.cron.ts (1)
33-33: Cron schedule change approved, but verify impact.The change from running every minute to every hour aligns with the PR objectives and could potentially improve system performance by reducing server load. However, it's important to verify that this reduced frequency doesn't negatively impact the timely processing of ongoing monitoring tasks.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please run the following verification steps:
- Check if there are any time-sensitive operations in the
handleCronmethod that might be affected by the hourly schedule.- Verify that the new schedule aligns with the business requirements for ongoing monitoring.
- Monitor the system after deployment to ensure that the reduced frequency doesn't cause any backlogs or delays in processing.
services/workflows-service/src/rule-engine/risk-rule.service.intg.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
IN_CASE_INSENSITIVE, enhancing the rule schema's capabilities for case-insensitive operations.riskLevelcategorization to include a new value,high, for more nuanced risk assessments.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests
IN_CASE_INSENSITIVEoperator and improved error handling for various scenarios in the rule engine.