This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Syntax improvements for defs and symbols #75
Open
tonsky
wants to merge
8
commits into
atom:master
Choose a base branch
from
tonsky:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5aa3569
Do not mark full def* body with "meta.definition.global.clojure", mar…
tonsky 4390c2b
Fixed defs of dynamic vars
tonsky e74aaf5
Recognize single-char symbols
tonsky 9a50d4f
Symbols can’t start with [0-9#'], but can include [#$%&'|]
tonsky 5412432
Updated specs
tonsky 3e93e33
meta.definition to capture whole expression, entity.name to capture j…
tonsky 9220e86
Returned entity.name.function.clojure
tonsky 1dfe95f
Fix indentation
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And why was this removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was placing the same
entity.name.function
to all function calls insidedefn
. Because the token is the same, there was no way to distinguish between function declaration and function call. I checked with other syntaxes and they seem to putentity.name.*
on definitions only as wellThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I think this is worth keeping. I checked language-javascript, language-java, and language-php and all use
entity.name.function
for function declarations and function calls but have an additional meta scope to differentiate between whether it's a declaration or call (usuallymeta.function
vsmeta.{function|method}-call
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe you’re right. I was looking at Ruby. Returned it back