[#5861] improvement(CLI): Refactor the validation logic in the handle methods

[Abyss-lord]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

refactor the validation logic of all entities and add test case, just like validation of table command #5906 . A hint is provided when the user's output is missing the required arguments. for example:

gcli column list -m demo_metalake, --name Hive_catalog
# Malformed entity name.
# Missing required argument(s): schema, table

gcli column details -m demo_metalake, --name Hive_catalog --audit
# Malformed entity name.
# Missing required argument(s): schema, table, column

gcli user delete -m demo_metalake
Missing --user option.

Currently, the Role command needs to be refactored and opened as a separate issue

Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #5861

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

NO

How was this patch tested?

local test

[Abyss-lord]

Hi @justinmclean @xunliu @tengqm @mchades , could you please review this PR when you have time? I’d really appreciate your feedback.

[tengqm]

Regarding the scope, this PR looks good to me other than a typo.
However, I would NOT structure the validation of options/args this way. I'd delegate the validation to those command objects. I.e.

• Treat this class as a factory of command objects and focus
  on creating and invoking the correct commands.
• Let the command objects do their own validation and execution.
• To avoid a huge refactoring, we can treat parameter validation a part of the handle() workflow.

However, this belongs to a different (series of) PRs.