MAINT: tech review

[RobPasMue]

Great job here @jorgepiloto and @Revathyvenugopal162 - green light from my side. Let me summarize my changes here:

Summary

• Updating pre-commit and adding new hooks
• Removing Python 3.7 from tox file
• Specifying coverage report for ansys.tools.meilisearech and not ansys.tools (there are many other ansys.tools.* packages
• Fix broken link on README
• Avoid duplicated checkout in CI/CD

Question/Suggestion

• Looking at your tests, I can see that you are "assuming" that the user has a local Meilisearch instance deployed on localhost at port 7700. I'd consider to include this in the documentation as a must-do, so that if anybody wants to contribute knows how to do it.
• Also, following the legal reqs all source code files should have the Copyright headr. No big deal for now, let's wait for the hook to be ready. I wouldn't lose time on this for now. But remember adding the hook once this one goes public.

[RobPasMue]

• Looking at your tests, I can see that you are "assuming" that the user has a local Meilisearch instance deployed on localhost at port 7700. I'd consider to include this in the documentation as a must-do, so that if anybody wants to contribute knows how to do it.

Even for this last point... I'd consider adding docker as a dependency and launching the container through a fixture, in case the port is free. Might be a bit of an overkill but worth considering. Once tests finish, you can close the container. That'd make the whole process very "atomic"

[Revathyvenugopal162]

• Looking at your tests, I can see that you are "assuming" that the user has a local Meilisearch instance deployed on localhost at port 7700. I'd consider to include this in the documentation as a must-do, so that if anybody wants to contribute knows how to do it.

Even for this last point... I'd consider adding docker as a dependency and launching the container through a fixture, in case the port is free. Might be a bit of an overkill but worth considering. Once tests finish, you can close the container. That'd make the whole process very "atomic"

Thanks for the suggestion Roberto, i will adapt this.

[Revathyvenugopal162]

Thank you so much for the review and feedback @RobPasMue