Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Makes AbstractIonWriter.writeValues iterative. #790

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

tgregg
Copy link
Contributor

@tgregg tgregg commented Apr 12, 2024

Description of changes:

Employs the exact same technique from #368. The code is almost identical in both places; this PR does not aim to address the existing issue of duplication, which would require some refactoring. The fix from #368 affects the text writer, while this PR affects the binary writer.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@@ -87,90 +87,124 @@ public final void writeValue(final IonReader reader) throws IOException

public final void writeValueRecursive(final IonReader reader) throws IOException
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps it would be good to add a comment saying that it does a depth-first (recursion-like) traversal of the all values on the IonReader, but the method is not actually implemented using recursion.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

@tgregg tgregg force-pushed the abstractionwriter-writevalues-iterative branch from 209398b to 5367d12 Compare April 12, 2024 23:31
@tgregg tgregg merged commit 146c2e4 into master Apr 12, 2024
22 of 33 checks passed
@tgregg tgregg deleted the abstractionwriter-writevalues-iterative branch April 12, 2024 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants