Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: TOOLS-2964 Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies #306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

a-spiker
Copy link
Contributor

@a-spiker a-spiker commented Sep 6, 2024

Error Syntax has changed to ERROR:

Checking what can be added as test for this.

Error Syntax has changed to ERROR:
@a-spiker a-spiker changed the title Fix: (TOOLS-2964) Error Response from 7.2 Fix: (TOOLS-2964) Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies Sep 6, 2024
@a-spiker a-spiker marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 11:31
Copy link

@jdogmcsteezy jdogmcsteezy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a good initial task! LGTM. Only nit would be

Fix: (TOOLS-2964) Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies

should be

fix: TOOLS-2964 Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies

of course when you officially take it over you can do whatever you want but that is the current formatting rule.

After this is merged, make sure to update the aerospike-tools package to point to the latest master of aerospike-admin. Normally the commit message for that is "update admin TOOLS-2963. This helps someone looking at the ticket to see that a change has been places at the individual tool repo and then at the meta-package level.

@a-spiker a-spiker changed the title Fix: (TOOLS-2964) Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies fix: TOOLS-2964 Error Response from 7.2 for Show Latencies Sep 10, 2024
@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 merged commit 56de1c7 into master Sep 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 deleted the tools-2964 branch September 10, 2024 05:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants