📄 Gently frame overvoting and by extension loan recursion #17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Obviously, the Commission knows this is a problem; otherwise, they would've just released the info in Patrick's FOIA. And frankly, as Chives has said, it's really more of an "open secret" what's happening here.
I don't want to rub salt in the wound too much here, especially since we're going to have some fast movement on the crypto work as soon as Reps lead the Commission. But still, I'd like to establish authority and cite a revealing case of unknown internal policies.
Implements JFWooten4/DUNA-docs#2 starting at L152, moved relatively ahead for prologue.