Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Handle None responses in ask function and update prepare_answer_… #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Jan 20, 2025

…sources to filter out None nodes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in response processing
    • Enhanced robustness of node processing by filtering out invalid entries
  • Refactor

    • Updated method signature to support optional node values
    • Implemented more flexible node handling in answer source preparation

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two key modifications: enhanced error handling in the RabbitRouter's ask function and improved node processing in the PrepareAnswerSources class. The changes focus on increasing robustness by explicitly managing scenarios with None responses or node values, ensuring more reliable error detection and processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
routers/amqp.py Added conditional check in ask function to raise ValueError if response is None
utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py Updated method signature to accept None nodes and added filtering to process only valid nodes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, where rabbits roam free,
Handling None with grace and glee
Error checks spring up like carrots so bright
Robust logic leaps with pure delight!
No null shall pass without our might! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
routers/amqp.py (1)

64-66: Enhance error handling with more context.

While checking for None responses is good, the error message could be more descriptive. Consider including the community_id and question in the error message to aid debugging.

-                raise ValueError("not confident in answering!")
+                raise ValueError(f"Not confident in answering question for community {community_id}. Question: {question}")
utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py (3)

73-74: Add logging for filtered None nodes.

Consider logging when None nodes are filtered out to help with debugging and monitoring.

+        none_count = sum(1 for n in nodes if n is None)
+        if none_count > 0:
+            logging.warning(f"Filtered out {none_count} None nodes from input")
         cleaned_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n is not None]

24-24: Consider early input validation.

The method accepts potentially None nodes but only filters them after the empty check. Consider validating and cleaning the input earlier to maintain consistent behavior.

-    def prepare_answer_sources(self, nodes: list[NodeWithScore | None]) -> str:
-        if len(nodes) == 0:
+    def prepare_answer_sources(self, nodes: list[NodeWithScore | None]) -> str:
+        if not nodes:
+            logging.error("No reference nodes available! returning empty string.")
+            return ""
+
+        cleaned_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n is not None]
+        if not cleaned_nodes:
             logging.error("No reference nodes available! returning empty string.")
             return ""
-
-        cleaned_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n is not None]

Also applies to: 73-77


73-74: Consider using filter() for better readability.

The list comprehension could be replaced with filter() for a more functional approach.

-        cleaned_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n is not None]
+        cleaned_nodes = list(filter(None, nodes))
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64b74e3 and 6521f82.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • routers/amqp.py (1 hunks)
  • utils/query_engine/prepare_answer_sources.py (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: ci / lint / Lint
  • GitHub Check: ci / test / Test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
routers/amqp.py (1)

64-66: Verify error handling in consumer.

The ValueError will cause the message to be rejected. Ensure the consumer properly handles this specific error case, possibly by implementing a dead letter queue (DLQ) for failed messages.

✅ Verification successful

Error handling is properly implemented

The ValueError is handled appropriately as it's caught by the global try-except block in the AMQP consumer. The code uses FastStream's RabbitRouter which automatically handles message acknowledgments and rejections. Failed messages are logged with proper context (community_id) for monitoring and debugging purposes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling or DLQ configuration in consumer code
rg -A 5 "dead.*letter|dlq|error.*queue" 

Length of output: 41


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for AMQP configuration and message handling patterns
echo "=== AMQP Configuration ==="
rg -l "import.*pika|rabbitmq|amqp" 

echo -e "\n=== Message Processing and Error Handling ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} except $_: {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\n=== Message Acknowledgment Patterns ==="
rg -B2 -A2 "basic_ack|basic_nack|basic_reject"

Length of output: 647


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine AMQP router implementation
echo "=== AMQP Router Content ==="
cat routers/amqp.py

echo -e "\n=== Python Error Handling Patterns ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'try:
    $$$
except $_:
    $$$'

echo -e "\n=== Message Handling Patterns ==="
rg -B3 -A3 "channel\.|message\.|delivery"

Length of output: 11715

@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit a4ab241 into main Jan 20, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant