-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: using newer hivemind-backend lib version! #107
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@amindadgar has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py (2)
84-96
: Consider adding error handling for event dispatchingWhile the instrumentation implementation is good, consider wrapping the event dispatching in try-except blocks to ensure query functionality isn't affected if event dispatching fails.
@dispatcher.span def query( self, str_or_query_bundle: str | QueryBundle ) -> tuple[RESPONSE_TYPE, list[NodeWithScore]]: - dispatcher.event(QueryStartEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle)) + try: + dispatcher.event(QueryStartEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle)) + except Exception as e: + self.callback_manager.on_event_error(e, event_type="QueryStartEvent") with self.callback_manager.as_trace("query"): if isinstance(str_or_query_bundle, str): str_or_query_bundle = QueryBundle(str_or_query_bundle) query_result, qa_pairs_all = self._query(str_or_query_bundle) - dispatcher.event( - QueryEndEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle, response=query_result) - ) + try: + dispatcher.event( + QueryEndEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle, response=query_result) + ) + except Exception as e: + self.callback_manager.on_event_error(e, event_type="QueryEndEvent") return query_result, qa_pairs_all
89-89
: Consider adding timeout to trace contextThe trace context should have a reasonable timeout to prevent hanging operations.
- with self.callback_manager.as_trace("query"): + with self.callback_manager.as_trace("query", timeout=300): # 5 minutes timeout
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
requirements.txt
(1 hunks)utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
requirements.txt (3)
10-13
: Verify integration of new llama-index packages
New llama-index related packages have been added. These seem to support the changes in subquestion_engine.py.
✅ Verification successful
Llama-index packages are actively used throughout the codebase
The codebase extensively uses llama-index packages across multiple components:
- Core functionality in query engines (
utils/query_engine/
) - Retrievers implementation (
bot/retrievers/
) - Test suites (
tests/unit/
) - Subquery handling (
subquery.py
)
The new package llama-index-vector-stores-postgres
aligns with existing postgres vector store usage in bot/retrievers/retrieve_similar_nodes.py
.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for llama-index usage
rg "from llama_index|import llama_index"
Length of output: 8881
14-14
:
The version jump from 0.14.1 to 0.31.0 is significant and may introduce breaking changes. Please verify:
- All traceloop instrumentation still works as expected
- No deprecated features are in use
8-8
: Verify compatibility with tc-hivemind-backend 1.4.2.post1
The update to tc-hivemind-backend is significant. Please ensure all dependent functionality is tested.
utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py (1)
13-18
: LGTM: Clean instrumentation setup
The addition of query event tracking is well-structured and follows best practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py (1)
85-92
: Consider adding error handling for event dispatchingThe event dispatching code could benefit from error handling to ensure that failures in event tracking don't affect the main query flow.
Consider wrapping the event dispatching in try-except blocks:
- dispatcher.event(QueryStartEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle)) + try: + dispatcher.event(QueryStartEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle)) + except Exception as e: + logger.warning(f"Failed to dispatch QueryStartEvent: {e}") with self.callback_manager.as_trace("query"): if isinstance(str_or_query_bundle, str): str_or_query_bundle = QueryBundle(str_or_query_bundle) query_result, qa_pairs_all = self._query(str_or_query_bundle) - dispatcher.event( - QueryEndEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle, response=query_result) - ) + try: + dispatcher.event( + QueryEndEvent(query=str_or_query_bundle, response=query_result) + ) + except Exception as e: + logger.warning(f"Failed to dispatch QueryEndEvent: {e}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py (4)
3-3
: LGTM: Clean instrumentation setup
The new imports and dispatcher initialization are well-organized and follow the standard instrumentation pattern.
Also applies to: 8-8, 16-16
81-81
: LGTM: Comprehensive tracing implementation
The implementation properly integrates tracing using both the span decorator and trace context manager, which will provide good observability of query execution.
Also applies to: 86-86
82-84
: LGTM: Well-defined type annotations
The type annotations are precise, use modern Python syntax, and accurately reflect the method's input and output types.
82-84
: Verify compatibility with existing callers
Since the return type is now explicitly defined, ensure all callers of this method are updated to handle both components of the tuple return value.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the usage and impact.
Let me check the actual implementation and usage patterns to ensure we have a complete picture.
Return type change is compatible with existing usage
Based on the code analysis:
- In
discord_query.py
, the caller unpacks the response object directly asresponse.response, response.source_nodes
- In
subquery.py
, the caller explicitly handles the tuple return type and correctly unpacks it asresponse, source_nodes = result
Both callers are already handling the return value correctly, making them compatible with the explicit tuple return type annotation. The change is purely a type annotation improvement that matches the existing behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for instances where this class is used
rg -l "CustomSubQuestionQueryEngine" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
# Show usage context
rg -B 2 -A 2 "CustomSubQuestionQueryEngine.*query\(" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 609
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports of CustomSubQuestionQueryEngine
rg -B 2 -A 2 "from.*CustomSubQuestionQueryEngine|import.*CustomSubQuestionQueryEngine"
# Search for any method calls that use .query( to see the call patterns
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\.query\("
Length of output: 1119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of query method and its callers
ast-grep --pattern 'def query($$$)' utils/query_engine/subquestion_engine.py
# Check the actual usage in the calling files
cat discord_query.py
cat subquery.py
Length of output: 8854
Summary by CodeRabbit
numpy
,pandas
,fastapi
, and others.tc-hivemind-backend
andtraceloop-sdk
.