-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SOMA ingestion integration #589
Merged
JohnMoutafis
merged 7 commits into
main
from
johnmoutafis/sc-42537/enable-soma-ingestion
Jul 10, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
03db0f7
SOMA ingestion: Attempt to unittest.
JohnMoutafis 7671654
Attempt to test `ingest_h5ad` method.
JohnMoutafis 05d0dc5
Fix unexcpected keyword arguments.
JohnMoutafis 333132f
Defaut values on missing keyword arguments of `ingest_h5ad`.
JohnMoutafis b3e4331
Test only dry_run for now.
JohnMoutafis fc406c1
Disable testing.
JohnMoutafis c1b7cf0
Attempt to reinstate development functionality.
JohnMoutafis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing this makes it impossible for me to locally test -- unless
as_batch
does this for me -- ?@JohnMoutafis please confirm ... 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@johnkerl
as_batch
will run a function as a batch UDF on TileDB Cloud.Have you tried running either
run_ingest_workflow
oringest
from your local?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JohnMoutafis I need to be able to edit a function and run it and have the remote be running my changed code, not the latest tagged version.
I haven't yet tried locally cloning this PR of yours as an experiment. I'll do so, before approving this PR, to verify that editable execution hasn't been broken by this PR.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did
pip install -v -e .
, edited locally (adding a print statement), and ran an ingest -- and confirmed that I did not see my mods being picked up by the remote executor. (More details in Slack.)