Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quick and dirty patch #141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

quick and dirty patch #141

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

nonprofittechy
Copy link
Member

I removed all uses of SpaCy, hopefully, stepping around the conflict that presented in the Weaver with updates to other packages. I was only able to do this, however, by making use of the tools.suffolklitlab.org micro-services: vectorize and passive. You can see the testing results in dev-testing/test package.ipynb Unfortunately, this means that there are now a number of features that require a tools_token to work. I have not updated the documentation to make this clear, but I will open an issue. Also, I'm not sure if we want to push this change to PiPy or have the Weaver install from this branch as a hot fix. Obviously, where Weaver calls these functions no using tools, we'll need to pass a token.

I removed all uses of SpaCy, hopefully, stepping around the conflict that presented in the Weaver with updates to other packages. I was only able to do this, however, by making use of the tools.suffolklitlab.org micro-services: `vectorize` and `passive`. You can see the testing results in `dev-testing/test package.ipynb` Unfortunately, this means that there are now a number of features that require a tools_token to work. I have not updated the documentation to make this clear, but I will open an issue. Also, I'm not sure if we want to push this change to PiPy or have the Weaver install from this branch as a hot fix. Obviously, where Weaver calls these functions no using tools, we'll need to pass a token.
@nonprofittechy nonprofittechy merged commit f59f589 into main Oct 24, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants