refactor(explorer-e2e): adjust address amount test

[telestrial]

No description provided.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

5 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
explorer	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 13, 2024 8:41pm
explorer-zen	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 13, 2024 8:41pm
hostd	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 13, 2024 8:41pm
renterd	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 13, 2024 8:41pm
website	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Nov 13, 2024 8:41pm

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4a6598e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[telestrial]

• feat(explorer): use explored for the contracts route #761
• refactor(explored-types): add outputID to ExplorerFileContract #811
• refactor(explorer-e2e): adjust address amount test #812 👈
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @telestrial and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[alexfreska]

What does removing this value do?

[telestrial]

This test was failing because there's some rounding inconsistency here that I don't completely understand. I don't believe it comes from any adjustments I've made. The rendered amount was flipping between 1.262 and 1.261 MS. I do think it's probably worth it to create a task to investigate but I'm not sure it's worth it to pin the success of this test on. Definitely willing to defer to your wisdom on that, though!

[alexfreska]

Interesting, I don't see why the value would change, can you consistently recreate the flipping when you run the test locally?

[alexfreska]

Interested to investigate why the number would be changing, but do merge if it stabilizes the tests while the focus is elsewhere.

[telestrial]

Taking a gander at this some more, I was wrong about my assumption that it was a rounding issue. I think it is that this address is being "spent down" from when I first wrote the test. That's a good reason not to try to test this value--that it's going to change over time.