Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps-dev): bump ts-jest from v29.1.1 to v29.1.2 #801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.1.1 -> 29.1.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

| datasource | package | from   | to     |
| ---------- | ------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | ts-jest | 29.1.1 | 29.1.2 |
@forking-renovate forking-renovate bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Mar 19, 2024
@Kurt-von-Laven Kurt-von-Laven self-requested a review March 19, 2024 04:56
@Kurt-von-Laven Kurt-von-Laven merged commit f666afa into ScribeMD:main Mar 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch March 19, 2024 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants