Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minor spelling and formatting errors #31

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Minor spelling and formatting errors #31

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion content/src/making-sense-of-organizations/drivers-and-requirements.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ In the context of Sociocracy 3.0, [effectiveness](section:principle-effectivenes

Reflecting on and describing organizational drivers and requirements supports:

- understanding situations that motivate action (**sense-making)**
- understanding situations that motivate action (**sense-making**)
- establishing whether and why a situation is relevant to respond to (**meaning-making**)
- determining direction and scope for a suitable response to the situation (**decision-making**)

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion content/src/principles/principle-consent.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ When a group or organization chooses to abide by the principle of consent, supre

## Distinguish between opinion or preference, and objections

Consent draws on the intelligence distributed throughout an organization, not only by inviting people to raise possible [objections](section:objection), bso by inviting people to then examine those arguments, rooting out any that are unfounded, evolving those they discover to be only partly true, and revealing those that are valid objections. So it's typically a good idea to [test arguments qualify as objections](section:test-arguments-qualify-as-objections) and only act on those that do. This helps avoid wasting time on arguments based merely on opinions, personal preference or bias.
Consent draws on the intelligence distributed throughout an organization, not only by inviting people to raise possible [objections](section:objection), but also by inviting people to then examine those arguments, rooting out any that are unfounded, evolving those they discover to be only partly true, and revealing those that are valid objections. So it's typically a good idea to [test whether arguments qualify as objections](section:test-arguments-qualify-as-objections) and only act on those that do. This helps avoid wasting time on arguments based merely on opinions, personal preference or bias.

Arguments that qualify as objections – at least as far as stakeholders can tell – help a group in directing their effort toward making changes in those areas where it's necessary or worthwhile to adapt and improve. Incremental improvement based on discovery and learning is built into consent and is an inevitable consequence of adopting the principle.

Expand Down