Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update after review #13966

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

remoteretrieval
Copy link
Contributor

@remoteretrieval remoteretrieval commented Sep 17, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced actions for retrieving all orders and creating device return orders.
    • Added a utility function to extract query parameters from URLs.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated naming conventions in documentation for clarity.
  • Removals
    • Removed actions for retrieving pending and specific orders.
  • Version Update
    • Updated package version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0.
  • Refactor
    • Significant changes to order retrieval methods and pagination approach.

@dylburger dylburger added the User submitted Submitted by a user label Sep 17, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 17, 2024

@remoteretrieval is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Oct 18, 2024 4:47pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from 1dd4b5a to 36eff80.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes to the remote retrieval application, including renaming elements in the documentation for clarity, adding new actions for retrieving and creating orders, and removing outdated functionalities. It also includes the addition of a utility function for URL parameter extraction and updates to the application structure, particularly in the pagination mechanism. A minor version increment in the package.json reflects these updates.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/remote_retrieval/README.md Renamed "Remote-Retriever API" to "Remote-Retrieval API"; changed "Retriever" to "Retrieval".
components/remote_retrieval/actions/all-orders/... Added all-orders.mjs for retrieving all orders with an async run method.
components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/... Added create-device-order.mjs for creating device return orders with properties and an async run method.
components/remote_retrieval/actions/get-pending-orders/... Removed get-pending-orders.mjs, eliminating the ability to fetch pending orders.
components/remote_retrieval/actions/get-specific-order/... Removed get-specific-order.mjs, eliminating the ability to fetch specific order details.
components/remote_retrieval/common/utils.mjs Added getParamFromUrl function for extracting URL parameters.
components/remote_retrieval/package.json Updated version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0.
components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs Removed oid, getOrder, and getDeviceReturnOrders methods; added allOrders method; changed pagination to cursor-based.

Suggested labels

triaged, bug

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

🐰 "In the garden of code, new paths we tread,
With orders to fetch and names that are spread.
From retriever to retrieval, we hop with delight,
As changes take shape, making things right.
A utility to help, with parameters to glean,
In the world of remote, we're swift and we're keen!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified.

@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs (1)

41-46: LGTM!

The addition of the allOrders method aligns with the AI-generated summary and reflects a broader strategy for order retrieval.

Consider the following when handling large datasets:

  • Implement pagination or limit/offset parameters to retrieve orders in smaller chunks.
  • Use caching mechanisms to store and reuse frequently accessed order data.
  • Monitor the performance impact of retrieving all orders and optimize the endpoint if necessary.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d82d8f and cf16ec8.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • components/remote_retrieval/actions/all-orders/all-orders.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/remote_retrieval/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • components/remote_retrieval/actions/all-orders/all-orders.mjs
  • components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs
  • components/remote_retrieval/common/utils.mjs
Additional comments not posted (5)
components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs (5)

54-54: Approve the transition to cursor-based pagination.

The change from page to cursor for pagination aligns with the AI-generated summary and offers several benefits:

  • Cursor-based pagination is more efficient and scalable for large datasets.
  • It allows for forward-only traversal of records, reducing the likelihood of skipped or duplicated data.
  • Cursor-based pagination is less prone to concurrency issues compared to offset-based pagination.

67-68: LGTM!

The assignment of nextResources based on the presence of the resourceName property ensures compatibility with responses that have a different structure.


69-72: LGTM!

The checks for the presence and length of nextResources and the next property in the response ensure proper handling of pagination and termination conditions. The logging messages provide visibility into the pagination process.

Also applies to: 83-86


88-88: Verify the implementation of the utils.getParamFromUrl function.

The assignment of cursor using the utils.getParamFromUrl function with the response.next value aligns with the transition to cursor-based pagination.

Ensure that the utils.getParamFromUrl function is implemented correctly to extract the cursor value from the next URL. You can use the following script to retrieve the function implementation:

Verification successful

The utils.getParamFromUrl function is correctly implemented and used.

The getParamFromUrl function is properly defined in components/remote_retrieval/common/utils.mjs and imported in the main app file. Its implementation looks correct, as it extracts a parameter (default: "cursor") from a given URL. The usage in the reviewed file is consistent with the transition to cursor-based pagination.

Here's a brief overview of the function:

function getParamFromUrl(url, key = "cursor") {
  // Implementation details
}

The function is used correctly in the context of cursor-based pagination:

cursor = utils.getParamFromUrl(response.next);

This implementation ensures that the cursor value is properly extracted from the next URL in the response, supporting the pagination mechanism.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve the implementation of the `utils.getParamFromUrl` function.

# Test: Search for the function declaration. Expect: The function implementation.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'function getParamFromUrl($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the implementation and usage of getParamFromUrl function

# Search for any function or method containing "getParamFromUrl"
echo "Searching for getParamFromUrl function:"
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'getParamFromUrl = $_' -o
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'getParamFromUrl($_) { $$$ }' -o
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'getParamFromUrl: function($_) { $$$ }' -o

# Look for utility files
echo -e "\nSearching for utility files:"
fd -e js -e mjs util

# Search for imports in remote_retrieval.app.mjs
echo -e "\nSearching for imports in remote_retrieval.app.mjs:"
rg "import.*from" components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs

# Search for usage of getParamFromUrl
echo -e "\nSearching for usage of getParamFromUrl:"
rg "getParamFromUrl"

Length of output: 15667


8-8: Verify the impact of removing propDefinitions.

The removal of the propDefinitions object, including the oid property, is consistent with the AI-generated summary. This change suggests a shift in the application's structure and functionality.

Run the following script to verify the impact of removing propDefinitions on the codebase:

Verification successful

Removal of propDefinitions and "oid" property is safe

The verification process confirms that removing the empty propDefinitions object and the "oid" property from the remote_retrieval.app.mjs file does not impact the rest of the codebase. The propDefinitions object was empty, and there are no references to an "oid" property in the remote_retrieval component or related files.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removal of `propDefinitions` does not break the codebase.

# Test: Search for references to `propDefinitions` or its properties. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type javascript $'propDefinitions|oid'

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to `propDefinitions` and `oid` in JavaScript files

# Search for "propDefinitions" in .js, .mjs, and .jsx files
echo "Searching for 'propDefinitions':"
rg -i 'propDefinitions' --glob '*.{js,mjs,jsx}'

echo -e "\nSearching for 'oid':"
rg -i 'oid' --glob '*.{js,mjs,jsx}'

Length of output: 179831

@remoteretrieval
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please merge our workflow code with main branch.

Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @remoteretrieval, I have a question, what is the reason for deleting the actions?

name: "Get All Order",
description: "Retrieve a list of all orders.[See the documentation](https://www.remoteretrieval.com/api-documentation/#pending-orders)",
type: "action",
version: "0.1.0",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
version: "0.1.0",
version: "0.0.1",

name: "Create Device Order",
description: "Creates a device return order. [See the documentation](https://www.remoteretrieval.com/api-documentation/#create-order)",
type: "action",
version: "0.1.0",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
version: "0.1.0",
version: "0.0.1",

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@pipedream/remote_retrieval",
"version": "0.1.0",
"version": "0.1.1",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"version": "0.1.1",
"version": "0.2.0",

@remoteretrieval
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @remoteretrieval, I have a question, what is the reason for deleting the actions?

We updated our system therefore we remove unnecessary action in PD.

luancazarine
luancazarine previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @remoteretrieval, LGTM! Ready for QA!

@vunguyenhung
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement.

Please check the test report below for more information
https://vunguyenhung.notion.site/update-after-review-106bf548bb5e8177b4ebcb8d0366ebd3

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (3)

9-118: Props look good, consider adding input validation.

The props are well-defined with appropriate labels and descriptions. Good job on making some fields optional and providing default values where applicable.

Consider adding input validation for fields like email, phone, and zip code to ensure data integrity. For example:

employeeInfoEmail: {
  type: "string",
  label: "Employee Info Email",
  description: "Used in email communications with the employee.",
  validate: (value) => {
    const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
    if (!emailRegex.test(value)) {
      return "Please enter a valid email address.";
    }
  },
},

121-128: Method looks good, consider adding error handling.

The createDeviceReturn method is correctly implemented using the app.post method.

Consider adding error handling to make the method more robust:

createDeviceReturn(args = {}) {
  return this.app.post({
    path: "/create-order/",
    ...args,
  }).catch(err => {
    throw new Error(`Failed to create device return: ${err.message}`);
  });
},

130-186: Run function looks good, consider adding input validation and error handling.

The run function is well-structured and correctly uses the createDeviceReturn method with the appropriate payload.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add input validation before making the API call:
if (!employeeInfoEmail || !employeeInfoName) {
  throw new Error("Employee email and name are required.");
}
  1. Add error handling for the API call:
try {
  const response = await this.createDeviceReturn({
    // ... existing code ...
  });

  step.export("$summary", `Successfully created device return order with ID \`${response.order}\``);
  return response;
} catch (error) {
  step.export("$summary", `Failed to create device return order: ${error.message}`);
  throw error;
}

These changes will make the function more robust and provide better feedback to the user in case of errors.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 540fd91 and 281929e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.

The import statement and action metadata are correctly implemented. The version number is set to "0.0.1" as suggested in a previous review.


1-188: Overall structure and exports are correct.

The file structure follows Pipedream's component guidelines, including all necessary elements for a proper action. Good job on adhering to the best practices mentioned in the PR objectives.

@remoteretrieval
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please merge our workflow code with main branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
User submitted Submitted by a user
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants