Updated @mui/system to 6.1.0

[Aryan4884]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2540

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A

Summary

Updated the package @mui/system from 5.16.7 to 6.1.0

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new dependency to enhance the project's capabilities.

This update improves the project's functionality by incorporating the latest version of the MUI system.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

79 files out of 281 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The package.json file for the talawa-api project has been updated to include a new dependency, specifically upgrading the @mui/system package from version 5.16.7 to 6.1.0. This change adds the dependency to the dependencies section without altering any other existing dependencies or the overall structure of the file.

Changes

File	Change Summary
package.json	Added dependency "@mui/system": "^6.1.0"

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Upgrade the @mui/system package from version 5.16.7 to 6.1.0.	✅
Address issues that caused previous automated upgrade attempts to fail.	❌	No evidence of addressing previous upgrade issues.
Update multiple files to accommodate new syntax, functions, methods, and classes introduced in the major version upgrade.	❌	No updates to other files were made to accommodate changes.
Remove the @mui/system package if it is unused or unnecessary.	❓	Uncertainty about usage and necessity of the package.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, a new bloom does rise,
With @mui/system, we reach for the skies.
A version upgraded, dependencies aligned,
In the world of APIs, new features we find!
Hopping along, with joy we embrace,
Each change a step in our coding race! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.74%. Comparing base (7631f17) to head (2861222).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2639   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.74%   97.74%           
========================================
  Files          358      358           
  Lines        18101    18101           
  Branches      2600     2600           
========================================
  Hits         17693    17693           
  Misses         404      404           
  Partials         4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7631f17 and 2861222.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (1 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unnecessary @mui/system dependency

The @mui/system package should be removed as:

1. No Material UI imports or usage found in the source code
2. This is confirmed to be a backend project with no React frontend components
3. While @mui/lab and @mui/material list it as a dependency in package-lock.json, these packages themselves are not declared in package.json
4. The presence of vite/vitest files is only for testing purposes, not frontend development

Please remove this dependency as it's unused and inappropriate for a backend service.

🔗 Analysis chain

Investigate necessity of @mui/system in backend API.

@mui/system is typically a frontend UI package used with React applications. Its presence in a backend Node.js/GraphQL API is unusual and potentially unnecessary.

Let's verify if this package is actually used in the codebase:

Based on the PR objectives and the nature of this package, I recommend:

1. If the package is unused, remove it entirely
2. If it's only needed for a specific function, consider implementing that functionality directly
3. If it's a transitive dependency, declare it in devDependencies or find alternative packages

Would you like me to help remove this dependency and implement any necessary functionality directly in the codebase?

---

Let me gather more information about the actual usage of Material UI components in the codebase.

This will help us understand if:

1. There's any actual usage of MUI components in the code
2. What other MUI packages are declared as dependencies
3. Whether this project has any React dependencies that would justify MUI usage

---

Let me fix the regex and try one final verification:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports or usage of @mui/system
echo "Searching for @mui/system imports and usage..."
rg -l "@mui/system"

# Search for any Material-UI related imports
echo -e "\nSearching for other Material-UI related imports..."
rg -l "@mui/"

# Check package-lock.json for dependency relationships
echo -e "\nChecking if any other packages depend on @mui/system..."
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
  jq '.packages | to_entries[] | select(.value.dependencies != null) | select(.value.dependencies["@mui/system"] != null) | .key' package-lock.json
fi

Length of output: 677

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any actual imports of @mui components in source files
echo "Checking for Material UI imports in source code..."
rg -l "from ['\"]\@mui/" --type ts --type js

# Check if @mui/lab and @mui/material are also in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for other MUI dependencies..."
jq '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@mui/")))' package.json

# Look for any React-related dependencies to see if this is actually a frontend component
echo -e "\nChecking for React-related dependencies..."
jq '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("react")))' package.json

Length of output: 671

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any MUI imports with fixed regex
echo "Checking for Material UI imports in source code..."
rg -l "from ['\"]@mui" --type ts --type js

# Check if this is actually a frontend project by looking for typical frontend files
echo -e "\nChecking for frontend-related files..."
fd -e jsx -e tsx

# Look for any React configuration files
echo -e "\nChecking for React configuration files..."
fd "react|vite|webpack" -t f

Length of output: 637

[palisadoes]

Please make code rabbit approve the PR. It appears that this package is not being used in the code base.

[palisadoes]

Please fix the failing tests