Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libckteec: serialize_ck.c: serialize AES-GCM mechanism parameters #364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

maroueneboubakri
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds serialize_mecha_aes_gcm() function to serialize_ck.c to support AES-GCM mechanism (CKM_AES_GCM) in libckteec.

libckteec/src/serialize_ck.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libckteec/src/serialize_ck.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libckteec/src/serialize_ck.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maroueneboubakri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments addressed

Copy link
Contributor

@etienne-lms etienne-lms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside my pending comment, the change looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>.

libckteec/src/serialize_ck.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maroueneboubakri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comment addressed an tag applied.

@etienne-lms
Copy link
Contributor

It seems you forgot to update your branch.

@maroueneboubakri
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems you forgot to update your branch.

Thanks ! done !

This commits adds serialize_mecha_aes_gcm() function to serialize_ck.c
to support AES-GCM mechanism (CKM_AES_GCM) in libckteec.

Co-developed-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marouene Boubakri <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
@jforissier jforissier merged commit 98dc4f4 into OP-TEE:master Dec 7, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants