Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][IMP] stock_inventory_discrepancy: better inheritance #2232

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thomaspaulb
Copy link

During the migration to 13.0 of this module it was decided to introduce a hook.

Refactoring to a regular override plays better with inheritance.

@thomaspaulb
Copy link
Author

@HviorForgeFlow Any reason not to revert back to this more common way?

@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb force-pushed the 16.0-stock_inventory_discrepancy-better_inheritance branch from a6f5c1d to bfd7067 Compare January 10, 2025 14:13
@HviorForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

@HviorForgeFlow Any reason not to revert back to this more common way?

No, I guess it was a decision without taking a count a possible inheritance. It makes more sense move it away from a hook.

@rvalyi rvalyi dismissed their stale review January 10, 2025 14:20

I was mistaken

@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb force-pushed the 16.0-stock_inventory_discrepancy-better_inheritance branch from bfd7067 to 3a0c20a Compare January 10, 2025 14:22
During the migration to 13.0 of this module it was decided to introduce a hook.

Refactoring to a regular override plays better with inheritance.
@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb force-pushed the 16.0-stock_inventory_discrepancy-better_inheritance branch from 3a0c20a to dcfd0dc Compare January 10, 2025 15:57
@thomaspaulb
Copy link
Author

Now green

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants