Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][ADD] base_tier_validation: allow comments being optional #712

Closed

Conversation

hbrunn
Copy link
Member

@hbrunn hbrunn commented Aug 29, 2023

this allows comments to be configured to be optional depending on the record being validated/rejected (the defaults are chosen such that existing definitions won't behave differently after the update)

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @LoisRForgeFlow,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@hbrunn hbrunn mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2023
@toyrobot
Copy link

toyrobot commented Aug 29, 2023

approve functional review

@bosd
Copy link
Contributor

bosd commented Jan 12, 2024

Looks good!
I know it is not by this commit.
But it is a bit confusing that the field has_comment actually means can_comment

@hbrunn hbrunn force-pushed the 16.0-base_tier_validation_comment_required branch from 717ac6d to 2d67e12 Compare January 16, 2024 11:12
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label May 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jun 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants