Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][IMP] add sequential and handle widget to inspection #157

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

rpsjr
Copy link

@rpsjr rpsjr commented Oct 21, 2024

fowardport from #134

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @marcelsavegnago,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

Copy link
Member

@marcelsavegnago marcelsavegnago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

rpsjr pushed a commit to rpsjr/fleet that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2024
@rpsjr rpsjr mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2024
1 task
rpsjr pushed a commit to rpsjr/fleet that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2024
Copy link

@ivantodorovich ivantodorovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-157-by-ivantodorovich-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 9cea75a into OCA:16.0 Oct 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 4b990a6. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants