-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC] Follow-up of the redesign of the documentation #3839
Comments
You can remove in 16.0:
|
Hopefully I'm part of this! I was preparing a group of documentation (draft) to be proposed and this subject is hot now in openupgrade, nice. Just to check before I create a PR to documentation branch, are the attached files content is the expectation? any comments? openupgrade_analysis.md I believe many people want to contribute to OpenUpgrade, but they face hard learning curve. It is possible to increase contributions by providing quick starters, this is the intention of documentation revamp right? I myself took the journey to be in current state (intermediate in openupgrade) and contributors did help here and there, but it was not easy journey. I would suggest having these areas in documentation:
this is related to python not having access to enough ram. ensure memory limits are good. |
hello Hussain,
totally ! For information, the work I am currently doing is part of an RFQ issued by the OCA in December. So there is a list of tasks to do, mainly writing use cases, then other explanatory points, then, at the end, a reorganization of the documentation. (table of contents, general structure). Thank you! |
Actually I landed somehow at that RFQ when I was roaming once the theme got changed, theme got me excited. So the RFQ is rewarded? I did not see any details in rewarded section, just my curiosity.
Sound great. |
Hi, I asked Rebecca to take care of this update on the website. |
Thanks for catching this team. All updated. |
this issue lists the changes made to the documentation.
If you are interested by the documentation, please review issue / PRs that are marked as "To review".
CC @etobella, @bguillot, @hbrunn, @StefanRijnhart, @pedrobaeza
Note :
Already reviewed and merged
(Click to expand)
January 25 : discussion about the interest of having a branch dedicated to documentation Documentation Branch #3702 and validation. (April 28)
April 29 : Issue about the broken documentation following the switch to the 16.0 branch : Openupgrade documentation broken #3836
April 30 : Initialization of the 'documentation' branch. [INIT] Initialize documentation branch #3837
april, 30 : [FIX] Missing API references, for specific methods for openupgrade 12.0, 13.0 and 16.0 [ADD] Missing API references, for specific methods for openupgrade 12.0, 13.0 and 16.0 #3838
May, 1st : [REF] Switch to sphinx_rtd_theme [REF] Switch to sphinx_rtd_theme #3841
May, 1st : [REF] Refactor files that describes the branch and add text that indicates how to develop the documentation locally [REF] Refactor files that describes the branch. #3840
May, 3 : [FIX] Do not ignore output path. (Fix 'View page source ' broken links) [DOC][FIX] Do not ignore output path. (Fix 'View page source ' broken links) #3849
May, 7 : [REF] Remove
docs
folder anddocsource
folders (except coverage file) and related CI. + Update readme file in the recent openupgrade branches. (14.0, 15.0, 16.0). (see @pedrobaeza comment) + Update documentation when coverage files changed in "main" branches, for the branches :May, 16 : [REF] Move openupgradelib API Section in openupgradelib documentation (and make openupgradelib documentation up to date, the last update was in 2015).
June, 1: Preliminary work : clean the intro part. Documentation clean intro #3902
June, 1 : [REF] Documentation remove obsolete files Documentation remove obsolete files #3903
June, 21 :
June, 26 : [IMP] Refactor Introduction [IMP] refactor intro #3924
August, 2 : [REF] Refactor of the structure Documentation - refactor of the structure #4103
November, 7 : [ADD] required knowledge section [ADD] documentation - required knowledge #4217
Write use Cases
Skipped Use Cases
Done, to review / Pending work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: