-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upgrade msbuild and fix omnisharp-roslyn #132165
Conversation
Result of 2 packages failed to build:1 suggestion:
Note that build failures may predate this PR, and could be nondeterministic or hardware dependent. Result of 2 packages built successfully:
5 suggestions:
|
I've updated my test project to use the changes of this PR: https://github.com/felschr/omnisharp-nix-issue |
Thanks, this also fixed an issue I had using omnisharp for emacs-lsp where omnisharp would find the embedded msbuild 16.8 but then claim it needed at least msbuild 16.8, which was strange. Much of the log messages seem to be duplicated, but that might not be due to omnisharp. Looking forward to the merge! |
I guess @jirkadanek for msbuild, although they don't look active. Maybe msbuild needs another maintainer as well? |
I thought about adding myself as maintainer. I'm still working on some cleanup of the nuget dependencies. I'd love it if all of that was dealt with in a consistent manner across nixpkgs, but |
I'm now known as @jiridanek (was @jirkadanek), but yes, I haven't touched nixpkgs in a long while now. And msbuild is quite difficult build to get back up to speed for me on. For personal use, I've given up on nixpkgs-packaged dotnet (and IntelliJ IDEs) and I am instead running the binary downloads... I had big plans around msbuild nixpkgs, but I somehow moved to other things; It would be still interesting to get back, but... so would be 100+1 other possible things... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not tested (other than running the binary) but they built and its better than the status quo
Should fix #126477
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)