Add read_nwb_method for local paths in both hdf5 and zarr

[h-mayorquin]

Motivation

See #1974

How to test the behavior?

I added tests.

Checklist

• Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
• Have you checked our Contributing document?
• Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
• Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running ruff check . && codespell from the source directory.
• Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 18.18182% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.39%. Comparing base (2c2bc85) to head (33847a6).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pynwb/__init__.py	18.18%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1994      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.69%   91.39%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        2708     2719      +11     
  Branches      707      710       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2483     2485       +2     
- Misses        149      158       +9     
  Partials       76       76              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	72.60% <18.18%> (-0.23%)	⬇️
unit	82.38% <18.18%> (-0.27%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stephprince]

Sorry for the delay @h-mayorquin! Added my review comments

[h-mayorquin]

Is the sphinx links fail related to this PR? Given my experience with neuroconv is seldom is and I looked at the CI log but no luck.

[stephprince]

Looks good to me, thanks! Added a few more small suggestions related to the docstrings.

[stephprince]

Suggested change

	f"Unable to read file: '{path}'. The file exists but is not recognized as "
	"either a valid HDF5 or Zarr NWB file. Please ensure the file contains valid NWB data."
	)
	f"Unable to read file: '{path}'. The file is not recognized as "
	"either a valid HDF5 or Zarr NWB file. Please ensure the file exists and contains valid NWB data."
	)

I think this error will occur even if the file does not exist.

[h-mayorquin]

Thanks!

[h-mayorquin]

I need to modify the test though, so I am doing this into another commit.