Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EpicsMotorIOC #62

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

EpicsMotorIOC #62

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

malitsky
Copy link

@malitsky malitsky commented May 6, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #62 into master will increase coverage by 3.28%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #62      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.16%   55.45%   +3.28%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines         692      743      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits          361      412      +51     
  Misses        331      331
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nslsii/tests/test_epstwostate_ioc.py 100% <ø> (ø)
nslsii/tests/test_epicsmotor_ioc.py 100% <100%> (ø)
nslsii/tests/temperature_controllers_test.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd076a7...b35b936. Read the comment docs.

nslsii/iocs/tests/temperature_controllers_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nslsii/iocs/tests/test_epicsmotor_ioc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nslsii/iocs/epics_motor_ioc_sim.py Show resolved Hide resolved
nslsii/iocs/tests/test_epstwostate_ioc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@awalter-bnl awalter-bnl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like to resolve the confusion and issues with the tests prior to merging see above comment chain.

awalter-bnl
awalter-bnl previously approved these changes May 10, 2019
@klauer klauer requested a review from awalter-bnl May 10, 2019 20:07
Copy link
Contributor

@awalter-bnl awalter-bnl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@klauer thanks for the review request, however I already have reviewed this a few times. The last concerns I had related to the location of the test files which @malitsky resolved, hence why I approved it.

Clearly their are still some outstanding comments from @tacaswell that require resolution.

Copy link
Member

@tacaswell tacaswell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test should be split up into multiple tests and the clean up logic moved to a fixture.

The time.sleep needs be removed.

The questions about how this behaves to semi-pathological input should be answered, but we can discuss if fixing that is in scope for this or not.

@awalter-bnl awalter-bnl dismissed their stale review May 10, 2019 20:54

Removing approval pending resolution of @tacswell ‘s comments

@malitsky
Copy link
Author

PR updated with Tom's comments.

@malitsky
Copy link
Author

fyi, @tacaswell and @awalter-bnl

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants