You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
by K.S. Heck, H.M. Johlas, and M.F. Howland proposes a replacement to the cos^(Pp, Pt) approach to modeling the effect of yaw misalignment accounting for changes in axial induction. Propose to implement in FLORIS.
Note this implementation will take the simplifying assumption that thrust is not being actively controlled to optimize against yaw, which is currently typical of wake steering, but leaves open future opportunities to optimized thurst.
Proposed solution
Add the new model into turbine.py, and configure it so that it works with the yaw_effective_velocity approach to ensure consistency of above rated conditions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pushing to v4.1, in our current thinking (@misi9170 double checking) v4.0 provides the framework / template and then this specific implementation is added in 4.1
Implement yaw impact of power and thrust via Heck et al
The paper: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics/article/modelling-the-induction-thrust-and-power-of-a-yawmisaligned-actuator-disk/3A34FC48A6BC52A78B6D221C13F4FC3A
by K.S. Heck, H.M. Johlas, and M.F. Howland proposes a replacement to the cos^(Pp, Pt) approach to modeling the effect of yaw misalignment accounting for changes in axial induction. Propose to implement in FLORIS.
Note this implementation will take the simplifying assumption that thrust is not being actively controlled to optimize against yaw, which is currently typical of wake steering, but leaves open future opportunities to optimized thurst.
Proposed solution
Add the new model into turbine.py, and configure it so that it works with the yaw_effective_velocity approach to ensure consistency of above rated conditions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: