indexer: exclude deleted/wrapped objects from snapshot

[gegaowp]

Description

https://mysten-labs.slack.com/archives/C0578KFD9D2/p1726765436840499
this will cut storage further down

Test plan

objects snapshot ingestion test

---

Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

• Protocol:
• Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
• Indexer:
• JSON-RPC:
• GraphQL:
• CLI:
• Rust SDK:
• REST API:

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
sui-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 9, 2024 8:17pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 9, 2024 8:17pm
sui-kiosk	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 9, 2024 8:17pm
sui-typescript-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 9, 2024 8:17pm

[wlmyng]

this might break a bunch of graphql tests because we expect partial data (ObjectRef) to be available, and we map that to ObjectStatus::WrappedOrDeleted. Now that we are excluding wrapped/deleted objects from the snapshot, these will yield empty results

[gegaowp]

this might break a bunch of graphql tests because we expect partial data (ObjectRef) to be available, and we map that to ObjectStatus::WrappedOrDeleted. Now that we are excluding wrapped/deleted objects from the snapshot, these will yield empty results

@wlmyng thx for the quick review! do I just need to look out and try to fix those tests, or there are real dependencies that we should hold on this change?

[amnn]

The dependency is real today, so the first step would be to remove the references to this kind of information from the GraphQL side.

[gegaowp]

@amnn sounds good, I also found a bug while writing this pr, I will split them then. regarding the references removal, do we have linear issue tracking, can we make one if not?

[amnn]

do we have linear issue tracking, can we make one if not?

I don't think so -- feel free to add one.

[gegaowp]

I am merging the other pre-requisite pr #19737 and this pr is now ready for another review @bmwill @wlmyng @amnn thanks!