[bridge-indexer] Integrate progress saving policy

[longbowlu]

Description

This PR integrates ProgressSavingPolicy. Basically, sui data sources use OutOfOrderSaveAfterDuration and eth data sources use SaveAfterDuration.

Also changed metric live_task_current_checkpoint to tasks_current_checkpoints to track all tasks in save_progress

Test plan

production deployment

---

Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

• Protocol:
• Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
• Indexer:
• JSON-RPC:
• GraphQL:
• CLI:
• Rust SDK:
• REST API:

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
sui-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 7, 2024 10:34pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 7, 2024 10:34pm
sui-kiosk	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 7, 2024 10:34pm
sui-typescript-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 7, 2024 10:34pm

[dariorussi]

LGTM.
Question: I thought the ingestion framework would call save progress only when a contiguous sequence of checkpoint was processed. Is that not the case?
Can you articulate why we need an out of order tracking for the ingestion framwork?

[longbowlu]

LGTM. Question: I thought the ingestion framework would call save progress only when a contiguous sequence of checkpoint was processed. Is that not the case? Can you articulate why we need an out of order tracking for the ingestion framwork?

we are talking offline about this