Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linting the toolchain (#230) #291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

henryleberre
Copy link
Member

Close #230 by linting the toolchain. I fixed many warnings but didn't address all of them.

@henryleberre henryleberre marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2024 01:15
@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

chipped away at this. i think most of the output needs to be considered somewhat more seriously now. things like unused arguments should probably be cleaned up. there are also some circular or missing imports (allegedly).

@henryleberre
Copy link
Member Author

@sbryngelson I fixed the rest of the issues. A few that I disabled in-place with # pylint: disable= will be fixed in my benchmarking PR. This PR should be good to go.

@henryleberre henryleberre marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 06:29
@henryleberre henryleberre marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2024 07:30
@henryleberre
Copy link
Member Author

Setting as "draft" status - awaiting merging of #293.

Co-authored-by: Spencer Bryngelson <[email protected]>
@henryleberre henryleberre marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 20:56
@henryleberre henryleberre merged commit 547c7a1 into MFlowCode:master Jan 5, 2024
16 checks passed
@henryleberre henryleberre deleted the linting branch January 5, 2024 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is it worth linting the toolchain/?
2 participants