Developer workflow: added auto generated workspace file from vitest extension in vscode

[nadr0]

Issue

How can devs run vitest in vscode with debug mode?

Implementation

I installed the latest vitest extension published by vitest. The extension complained about multiple config files and then suggested a workspace file to be generated. I am committing the auto generated file which let me run the tests.

Steps to run vitest + vscode

• Install vitest from vitest
• Create a file called vitest.workspace.ts in the root of modelingapp (I created this file automatically when I pressed the button when it suggested this file to be created. Don't know if we need to change anything)
• Go to testing pane and click the refresh icon
• You can now run tests from the testing pane or the *.test.ts files.
• Some vitest files require localhost:3000 to serve "GET /wasm_lib_bg.wasm" "node-fetch"
• Open a terminal and run yarn simpleserver:bg in the modelingapp directory.
• You can kill the server with yarn kill-port 3000 or your favorite way to kill the port.

The localhost server serves the .wasm file.

[qa-wolf]

QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up.
Click here to request test coverage for this PR!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
modeling-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 10, 2025 3:30pm

[jtran]

Nice. Thanks!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.84%. Comparing base (a77fa63) to head (844044a).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4997   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.84%   85.84%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines       31432    31432           
=======================================
  Hits        26984    26984           
  Misses       4448     4448           

Flag	Coverage Δ
wasm-lib	85.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.