Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-perfectionist to v2.11.0 #170

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 16, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-plugin-perfectionist (source) 2.8.0 -> 2.11.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

azat-io/eslint-plugin-perfectionist (eslint-plugin-perfectionist)

v2.11.0

Compare Source

compare changes

🚀 Features
  • Update svelte (861a381)
  • sort-classes: Add custom-group to sort-classes rule (1773ffb)
❤️ Contributors

v2.10.0

Compare Source

compare changes

🚀 Features
  • Allow typescript-eslint v7 (ccdaeb8)
🐞 Bug Fixes
  • sort-imports: Empty named imports being considered side-effect imports (ca69069)
❤️ Contributors

v2.9.0

Compare Source

compare changes

🚀 Features
  • Add sort-intersection-types rule (3ad40ff)
  • Use preserve modules for package build (be13a21)
🐞 Bug Fixes
  • Sort-objects ignore-pattern add property type (3de399f)
  • sort-exports: Work with star exports (ce76606)
❤️ Contributors

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.80%. Comparing base (9f9d051) to head (b66aee5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #170   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.80%   96.80%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         219      219           
  Branches       19       19           
=======================================
  Hits          212      212           
  Misses          7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 10 times, most recently from 2adce05 to c80230f Compare April 22, 2024 04:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 8 times, most recently from 0bf6c8f to f020660 Compare April 27, 2024 21:56
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-perfectionist to v2.9.0 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-perfectionist to v2.10.0 Apr 27, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 9 times, most recently from e935e3b to 80dc9e2 Compare May 3, 2024 09:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 2 times, most recently from f9f7fb5 to bc62628 Compare August 3, 2024 10:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 15 times, most recently from 5946a64 to 084f296 Compare August 25, 2024 09:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch 11 times, most recently from 889946b to 1d441c9 Compare November 20, 2024 02:08
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-perfectionist-2.x-lockfile branch from 1d441c9 to c436229 Compare November 20, 2024 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants