Choosing a Register Style #319
Conversation
I'm offering this for discussion. 1. Double-line format is not clearly explained and easily misunderstood as having something to do with splits 1. Auto-Split Ledger style is more easily explained after Basic Ledger and Transaction Journal style, and the two point list removed since there are three options It's not clear what double-line format is and how it is different from splits Current text does not clearly explain what double-line format is in terms of transactions and distingish it frm splitsis not explained very well and it is
| @@ -82,42 +82,27 @@ | |||
| <title>Choosing a Register Style</title> | |||
|
|
|||
| <para>&app; offers several options for viewing your registers. The default style is <guilabel>Basic | |||
| Ledger</guilabel> mode, which displays only the summary of splits affecting the current | |||
| Ledger</guilabel>, which displays only the total of splits affecting the current | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's only a total if we are dealing with a 1-to-many split, even there it's the 1 you are seeing. Or this could be a many-to-many split, in which case it's certainly not a total, it's just a split amount. So I think it's better to simply say:
which displays only the amount of the split affecting the current ledger.
I know there is more to it with the transfer account being shown (or "split transaction" if there are more than 2 splits) but that's just more info than needed here I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also maybe we should say register instead of ledger. It seems the 2 are used but I see register used below as well.
The use of "double" here certainly is not great considering the use of the same word in "double entry accounting" while it has nothing to do with it here. But I am not even sure what I would replace it with. |
I'm offering this for discussion.
I'm envisaging a discussion about Description/Notes/Memo in relation to Tags.