Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use CBMC version 5.95.1 #164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The upcoming CBMC version 6 release includes changes that may affect existing proofs. This PR will make sure that coreJSON PRs are not negatively impacted by this release. After releasing CBMC version 6 we will issue a follow-up PR that will return coreJSON to using CBMC's latest release, and will include any changes to proofs that may be necessary to support the new version.

Test Steps

Tested in CI (but no changes in behaviour at this point).

Checklist:

  • I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
  • I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

n/a

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

The upcoming CBMC version 6 release includes changes that may affect
existing proofs. This PR will make sure that coreJSON PRs are not
negatively impacted by this release. After releasing CBMC version 6 we
will issue a follow-up PR that will return coreJSON to using CBMC's
latest release, and will include any changes to proofs that may be
necessary to support the new version.
@tautschnig tautschnig requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2024 09:12
@kar-rahul-aws kar-rahul-aws merged commit fdfe306 into FreeRTOS:main Jun 10, 2024
11 checks passed
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the cbmc-5.95.1 branch June 10, 2024 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants