-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(templates/Stack): Add override #1592
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
GetParticle is thin wrapper. Let's use it more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/project_stl_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (3)
Line range hint
210-215
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the primary check.The changes improve encapsulation and add a valuable check to ensure the returned particle is a primary. This enhances the robustness of the method.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining why we check for
part->GetMother(0) < 0
to indicate a primary particle. This would improve code readability for future maintainers.TParticle* part = GetParticle(iPrim); +// A primary particle has no mother, so its mother ID should be negative if (!(part->GetMother(0) < 0)) { LOG(fatal) << "MyProjStack:: Not a primary track! " << iPrim; }
433-435
: LGTM! Consider usingoverride
keyword for consistency.The change from C-style cast to
static_cast
improves type safety and makes the cast more explicit. This is a good practice in modern C++.For consistency with modern C++ practices and to match the PR title "Add override", consider adding the
override
keyword to this method if it's overriding a virtual method from a base class. This would look like:-TParticle* MyProjStack::GetParticle(Int_t trackID) const +TParticle* MyProjStack::GetParticle(Int_t trackID) const override { if (trackID < 0 || trackID >= fNParticles) { LOG(fatal) << "MyProjStack: Particle index " << trackID << " out of range."; } return static_cast<TParticle*>(fParticles->At(trackID)); }This change would make it clear that this method is intended to override a base class method and would prevent accidental changes to the method signature.
Line range hint
1-535
: Consider broader application ofoverride
keywordThe changes in this PR improve type safety and encapsulation, which is great. However, the PR title mentions "Add override", but we don't see this implemented in the changes reviewed.
Consider reviewing all virtual methods in this class to add the
override
keyword where appropriate. This would improve code clarity and catch potential errors at compile-time. Here's a script to help identify potential candidates:#!/bin/bash # Find potential virtual methods that could use the override keyword ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'class MyProjStack : public FairGenericStack { $$$ $ret $name($args) $const { $$$ } $$$ }'This script will help identify method declarations within the
MyProjStack
class. Review these results and add theoverride
keyword to methods that override virtual methods from the base class.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- examples/common/mcstack/FairStack.cxx (1 hunks)
- templates/project_root_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (2 hunks)
- templates/project_stl_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
examples/common/mcstack/FairStack.cxx (4)
Line range hint
170-174
: Improved encapsulation and error handling inPopPrimaryForTracking
The changes in this method are well-implemented:
- Using
GetParticle(iPrim)
instead of direct array access improves encapsulation.- The added check ensures that only primary tracks are processed, enhancing error handling.
These modifications align with good software engineering practices and improve the overall robustness of the code.
Line range hint
179-184
: Improved consistency inGetCurrentTrack
The modification in this method is a positive change:
- Using
GetParticle(FairGenericStack::GetCurrentTrackNumber())
instead of direct array access maintains consistency with thePopPrimaryForTracking
method.- This change enhances the overall coherence of the code and makes it easier to maintain.
Line range hint
401-407
: Well-implementedGetParticle
methodThe addition of the
GetParticle
method is a valuable improvement:
- It centralizes the logic for retrieving particles, enhancing maintainability.
- The bounds check on
trackID
prevents potential out-of-bounds access, improving robustness.- This method supports the changes in
PopPrimaryForTracking
andGetCurrentTrack
, promoting consistency throughout the class.Overall, this is a well-thought-out addition that improves the code's structure and safety.
Line range hint
170-407
: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements toFairStack
classThe changes introduced in this pull request significantly enhance the
FairStack
class:
- Improved encapsulation and consistency in particle retrieval across multiple methods.
- Enhanced error handling, particularly in ensuring the correct processing of primary tracks.
- Addition of a centralized
GetParticle
method, which improves maintainability and safety.These modifications collectively contribute to a more robust, maintainable, and consistent codebase. The changes align well with software engineering best practices and should positively impact the overall quality of the FairRoot framework.
templates/project_root_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (4)
Line range hint
210-214
: Improved encapsulation inPopPrimaryForTracking
The change from directly accessing
fParticles->At(iPrim)
to usingGetParticle(iPrim)
is a good improvement. It enhances encapsulation by centralizing the particle retrieval logic in theGetParticle
method, making the code more consistent and easier to maintain.
428-428
: Improved type safety inGetParticle
The change from a C-style cast to
static_cast<TParticle*>
is a good improvement. It enhances type safety and makes the intent clearer.static_cast
is the appropriate choice here for the known, compile-time conversion from the baseTObject*
(returned byAt()
) toTParticle*
.
Line range hint
1-7
: Convenient overload added forPushTrack
The addition of this
PushTrack
overload with a defaultsecondparentID
of -1 is a good improvement. It provides a more convenient interface for common use cases where the second parent ID is not needed, while maintaining backward compatibility. This can lead to cleaner code at call sites.
Line range hint
1-528
: Overall improvements to code quality and usabilityThe changes in this file collectively improve the code quality and usability of the
MyProjStack
class. They enhance encapsulation, type safety, and API convenience without introducing breaking changes. These modifications align well with modern C++ best practices and maintain consistency with the existing codebase. Great job on these improvements!
Checklist: