Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(templates/Stack): Add override #1592

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ChristianTackeGSI
Copy link
Member


Checklist:

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the MyProjStack class, focusing on updating method signatures to include the override specifier for virtual functions. The destructor and several methods are adjusted to reinforce their intention to override base class counterparts. Additionally, the class definition macro is changed from ClassDef to ClassDefOverride, and the copyright comment is updated to reflect the years 2014-2024. Changes are also made to the FairStack class, enhancing encapsulation and error handling in particle retrieval methods.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
templates/project_root_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.h - Updated destructor and method signatures to include the override specifier.
- Changed class definition macro from ClassDef to ClassDefOverride.
- Updated copyright comment to 2014-2024.
examples/common/mcstack/FairStack.cxx - Modified PopPrimaryForTracking and GetCurrentTrack methods to use GetParticle for particle retrieval, enhancing encapsulation and error handling.
templates/project_stl_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx - Updated PopPrimaryForTracking to utilize GetParticle, improving encapsulation.
- Added range check in GetParticle for trackID parameter.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • karabowi
  • fuhlig1

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

GetParticle is thin wrapper. Let's use it more.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/project_stl_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (3)

Line range hint 210-215: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the primary check.

The changes improve encapsulation and add a valuable check to ensure the returned particle is a primary. This enhances the robustness of the method.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining why we check for part->GetMother(0) < 0 to indicate a primary particle. This would improve code readability for future maintainers.

 TParticle* part = GetParticle(iPrim);
+// A primary particle has no mother, so its mother ID should be negative
 if (!(part->GetMother(0) < 0)) {
     LOG(fatal) << "MyProjStack:: Not a primary track! " << iPrim;
 }

433-435: LGTM! Consider using override keyword for consistency.

The change from C-style cast to static_cast improves type safety and makes the cast more explicit. This is a good practice in modern C++.

For consistency with modern C++ practices and to match the PR title "Add override", consider adding the override keyword to this method if it's overriding a virtual method from a base class. This would look like:

-TParticle* MyProjStack::GetParticle(Int_t trackID) const
+TParticle* MyProjStack::GetParticle(Int_t trackID) const override
 {
     if (trackID < 0 || trackID >= fNParticles) {
         LOG(fatal) << "MyProjStack: Particle index " << trackID << " out of range.";
     }
     return static_cast<TParticle*>(fParticles->At(trackID));
 }

This change would make it clear that this method is intended to override a base class method and would prevent accidental changes to the method signature.


Line range hint 1-535: Consider broader application of override keyword

The changes in this PR improve type safety and encapsulation, which is great. However, the PR title mentions "Add override", but we don't see this implemented in the changes reviewed.

Consider reviewing all virtual methods in this class to add the override keyword where appropriate. This would improve code clarity and catch potential errors at compile-time. Here's a script to help identify potential candidates:

#!/bin/bash
# Find potential virtual methods that could use the override keyword
ast-grep --lang cpp --pattern $'class MyProjStack : public FairGenericStack {
  $$$
  $ret $name($args) $const {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

This script will help identify method declarations within the MyProjStack class. Review these results and add the override keyword to methods that override virtual methods from the base class.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7865555 and 5769b5a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • examples/common/mcstack/FairStack.cxx (1 hunks)
  • templates/project_root_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (2 hunks)
  • templates/project_stl_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
examples/common/mcstack/FairStack.cxx (4)

Line range hint 170-174: Improved encapsulation and error handling in PopPrimaryForTracking

The changes in this method are well-implemented:

  1. Using GetParticle(iPrim) instead of direct array access improves encapsulation.
  2. The added check ensures that only primary tracks are processed, enhancing error handling.

These modifications align with good software engineering practices and improve the overall robustness of the code.


Line range hint 179-184: Improved consistency in GetCurrentTrack

The modification in this method is a positive change:

  • Using GetParticle(FairGenericStack::GetCurrentTrackNumber()) instead of direct array access maintains consistency with the PopPrimaryForTracking method.
  • This change enhances the overall coherence of the code and makes it easier to maintain.

Line range hint 401-407: Well-implemented GetParticle method

The addition of the GetParticle method is a valuable improvement:

  1. It centralizes the logic for retrieving particles, enhancing maintainability.
  2. The bounds check on trackID prevents potential out-of-bounds access, improving robustness.
  3. This method supports the changes in PopPrimaryForTracking and GetCurrentTrack, promoting consistency throughout the class.

Overall, this is a well-thought-out addition that improves the code's structure and safety.


Line range hint 170-407: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to FairStack class

The changes introduced in this pull request significantly enhance the FairStack class:

  1. Improved encapsulation and consistency in particle retrieval across multiple methods.
  2. Enhanced error handling, particularly in ensuring the correct processing of primary tracks.
  3. Addition of a centralized GetParticle method, which improves maintainability and safety.

These modifications collectively contribute to a more robust, maintainable, and consistent codebase. The changes align well with software engineering best practices and should positively impact the overall quality of the FairRoot framework.

templates/project_root_containers/MyProjData/MyProjStack.cxx (4)

Line range hint 210-214: Improved encapsulation in PopPrimaryForTracking

The change from directly accessing fParticles->At(iPrim) to using GetParticle(iPrim) is a good improvement. It enhances encapsulation by centralizing the particle retrieval logic in the GetParticle method, making the code more consistent and easier to maintain.


428-428: Improved type safety in GetParticle

The change from a C-style cast to static_cast<TParticle*> is a good improvement. It enhances type safety and makes the intent clearer. static_cast is the appropriate choice here for the known, compile-time conversion from the base TObject* (returned by At()) to TParticle*.


Line range hint 1-7: Convenient overload added for PushTrack

The addition of this PushTrack overload with a default secondparentID of -1 is a good improvement. It provides a more convenient interface for common use cases where the second parent ID is not needed, while maintaining backward compatibility. This can lead to cleaner code at call sites.


Line range hint 1-528: Overall improvements to code quality and usability

The changes in this file collectively improve the code quality and usability of the MyProjStack class. They enhance encapsulation, type safety, and API convenience without introducing breaking changes. These modifications align well with modern C++ best practices and maintain consistency with the existing codebase. Great job on these improvements!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant