-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Depth cameras #181
Depth cameras #181
Conversation
d697da6
to
6a0909b
Compare
force pushed to rebase on master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it looks pretty good considering our time constraints, good job! 👍
Ideas for further development: Maybe it would not be so computationally challenging to simulate the infrared "projected points" and then interpolate between them to get that accuracy gradient with higher precision close by and worse far away. The Intel Realsense camera has an algorithm that it can execute on-board in real time, basic info here:
https://www.intelrealsense.com/stereo-depth-vision-basics/
We will be happy to return to this topic after comp, right now this is okay for us to "play with"
{ | ||
assert(multiple); | ||
return ((numToRound + multiple - 1) / multiple) * multiple; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am slightly confused about the rounding - how exactly does it work? Can you provide an example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
copied it from here ;) https://stackoverflow.com/a/9194117/2328729
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it rounds up to the nearest multiple of another number
@Plavit Your ideas for further development sounds good! Would you like to create a new issues for this so that it doesn't get lost in pr history? :D |
Hmm, good point - may I suggest just sticking to using the depth camera issue we were using up till now? It is already classified as enhancement if I recall correctly... |
Let's start with a clean slate in a new ticket and keep the #153 closed. I will mark it as enhancement again :) |
@SijmenHuizenga Done: #187 |
This pr adds depth camera's. Read the docs on a description of how they work.