Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#1180] handle production get subtree roots arg #1197

Conversation

LukasKorba
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #1180

This code review checklist is intended to serve as a starting point for the author and reviewer, although it may not be appropriate for all types of changes (e.g. fixing a spelling typo in documentation). For more in-depth discussion of how we think about code review, please see Code Review Guidelines.

Author

  • Self-review: Did you review your own code in GitHub's web interface? Code often looks different when reviewing the diff in a browser, making it easier to spot potential bugs.
  • Automated tests: Did you add appropriate automated tests for any code changes?
  • Code coverage: Did you check the code coverage report for the automated tests? While we are not looking for perfect coverage, the tool can point out potential cases that have been missed.
  • Documentation: Did you update Docs as appropiate? (E.g README.md, etc.)
  • Run the app: Did you run the app and try the changes?
  • Did you provide Screenshots of what the App looks like before and after your changes as part of the description of this PR? (only applicable to UI Changes)
  • Rebase and squash: Did you pull in the latest changes from the main branch and squash your commits before assigning a reviewer? Having your code up to date and squashed will make it easier for others to review. Use best judgement when squashing commits, as some changes (such as refactoring) might be easier to review as a separate commit.

Reviewer

  • Checklist review: Did you go through the code with the Code Review Guidelines checklist?
  • Ad hoc review: Did you perform an ad hoc review? In addition to a first pass using the code review guidelines, do a second pass using your best judgement and experience which may identify additional questions or comments. Research shows that code review is most effective when done in multiple passes, where reviewers look for different things through each pass.
  • Automated tests: Did you review the automated tests?
  • Manual tests: Did you review the manual tests?You will find manual testing guidelines under our manual testing section
  • How is Code Coverage affected by this PR? We encourage you to compare coverage befor and after your changes and when possible, leave it in a better place. Learn More...
  • Documentation: Did you review Docs, README.md, LICENSE.md, and Architecture.md as appropriate?
  • Run the app: Did you run the app and try the changes? While the CI server runs the app to look for build failures or crashes, humans running the app are more likely to notice unexpected log messages, UI inconsistencies, or bad output data.

…om the wallet database

- initial action in place
- verify loop WIP

[Electric-Coin-Company#1169] Step 5 -Get the suggested scan ranges from the wallet database

- firstUnenhancedHeight fix

[Electric-Coin-Company#1169] Step 5 -Get the suggested scan ranges from the wallet database

- first working version implemented
- download, scan and enhance actions are dependent on the context values only
- cleaned up the code
- ScanAlgorithm enum added to the SDK
- preferred sync algorithm set to .linear as default but can be changed to Spend before Sync as the Initializer.init parameter

[Electric-Coin-Company#1188] Working prototype of SbS

- error codes for failure states in the SbS State Machine changes added

[Electric-Coin-Company#1188] Working prototype of SbS (Electric-Coin-Company#1192)

- offline tests fixed
- RewindAction added
- rust's isContinuityError() emulated on iOS side
- verify scan range is now properly handled with rewind as well as check for continuity error

[Electric-Coin-Company#1189] Implement continuity check and RewindAction (Electric-Coin-Company#1195)

- TODO cleanup
@LukasKorba LukasKorba requested a review from HonzaR August 10, 2023 06:31
@LukasKorba LukasKorba merged commit 5b73113 into Electric-Coin-Company:feature/DAG-sync Aug 10, 2023
1 check passed
@LukasKorba LukasKorba deleted the 1180-Handle-production-GetSubtreeRootsArg branch August 31, 2023 05:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants