-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(rm): _add_missing_reads #3444
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
@Clinical-Genomics/sysdev Anyone that could help me test this one? We are only removing code , but maybe submitting an order should suffice. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
@henrikstranneheim I will have a look at this. There is likely a refactoring of the submitters coming #3574 . I will try to test and merge before that. Nice if we can remove the function before than. |
@Vince-janv Can you double check this for me here? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! @Karl-Svard confirmed that the function is not working and that the value is set later by LIMS
Thx for the help! Then I will merge this early next week if you do not beat me to it. |
@henrikstranneheim I think we can close this pr. I made some headway over the weekend and get the refactoring tested here: #3574 I made sure to remove the _add_missing_reads function there. If you agree you can close this PR, in favour of addressing it in the other. |
Great! |
Description
Added
Changed
Fixed
How to prepare for test
us
paxa
How to test
Expected test outcome
Review
Thanks for filling in who performed the code review and the test!
This version is a
Implementation Plan