Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabling symmetric and asymmetric keys to be created publicly with JWK #3089

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

trwalke
Copy link
Member

@trwalke trwalke commented Jan 10, 2025

Enabling symmetric and asymmetric keys to be created publicly with JWK

  • You've read the Contributor Guide and Code of Conduct.
  • You've included unit or integration tests for your change, where applicable.
  • You've included inline docs for your change, where applicable.
  • If any gains or losses in performance are possible, you've included benchmarks for your changes. More info
  • There's an open issue for the PR that you are making. If you'd like to propose a new feature or change, please open an issue to discuss the change or find an existing issue.

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

Description

{Detail}

Fixes #{bug number} (in this specific format)

@trwalke trwalke requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2025 19:33
Copy link

Summary

Summary
Generated on: 1/10/2025 - 7:54:00 PM
Coverage date: 1/10/2025 - 7:44:14 PM - 1/10/2025 - 7:53:31 PM
Parser: MultiReport (60x Cobertura)
Assemblies: 1
Classes: 7
Files: 2
Line coverage: 80.3% (620 of 772)
Covered lines: 620
Uncovered lines: 152
Coverable lines: 772
Total lines: 483
Branch coverage: 67.8% (228 of 336)
Covered branches: 228
Total branches: 336
Method coverage: Feature is only available for sponsors

Coverage

Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens - 80.3%
Name Line Branch
Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens 80.3% 67.8%
Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens.JwtTokenUtilities 100%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated 80.3% 67.8%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated 80.3% 67.8%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F12A1AEDDDFE32BA
DF4DBFF323AF1BCB48B9F9721B7CD3E05F5E034CF225E3DF8__CreateJweRegex_1
79.2% 68%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F12A1AEDDDFE32BA
DF4DBFF323AF1BCB48B9F9721B7CD3E05F5E034CF225E3DF8__CreateJwsRegex_0
81.4% 67.6%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F334844C618E00D3
CEC5D3FE0D00CF0141BBEE98635313BB2CB8D3921464CE05A__CreateJweRegex_1
79.2% 68%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F334844C618E00D3
CEC5D3FE0D00CF0141BBEE98635313BB2CB8D3921464CE05A__CreateJwsRegex_0
81.4% 67.6%

Copy link

Summary

Summary
Generated on: 1/10/2025 - 8:07:44 PM
Coverage date: 1/10/2025 - 7:58:06 PM - 1/10/2025 - 8:07:19 PM
Parser: MultiReport (60x Cobertura)
Assemblies: 1
Classes: 7
Files: 2
Line coverage: 80.3% (620 of 772)
Covered lines: 620
Uncovered lines: 152
Coverable lines: 772
Total lines: 483
Branch coverage: 67.8% (228 of 336)
Covered branches: 228
Total branches: 336
Method coverage: Feature is only available for sponsors

Coverage

Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens - 80.3%
Name Line Branch
Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens 80.3% 67.8%
Microsoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens.JwtTokenUtilities 100%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated 80.3% 67.8%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated 80.3% 67.8%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F12A1AEDDDFE32BA
DF4DBFF323AF1BCB48B9F9721B7CD3E05F5E034CF225E3DF8__CreateJweRegex_1
79.2% 68%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F12A1AEDDDFE32BA
DF4DBFF323AF1BCB48B9F9721B7CD3E05F5E034CF225E3DF8__CreateJwsRegex_0
81.4% 67.6%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F334844C618E00D3
CEC5D3FE0D00CF0141BBEE98635313BB2CB8D3921464CE05A__CreateJweRegex_1
79.2% 68%
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Generated.<RegexGenerator_g>F334844C618E00D3
CEC5D3FE0D00CF0141BBEE98635313BB2CB8D3921464CE05A__CreateJwsRegex_0
81.4% 67.6%

Copy link
Member

@brentschmaltz brentschmaltz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmprieur make sure you are OK with this public API.

Copy link
Contributor

@jmprieur jmprieur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thanks @trwalke

Where is the associated github issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants