created_at | updated_at | slug | tags | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-11-03 08:38:51 -0700 |
2021-11-03 08:38:51 -0700 |
dynamic-proxy-introduction |
|
动态代理说大不大,说小不小,可深可浅。往深了说还是对JVM的了解程度要足够深入,时间篇幅有限,本文专注于回答如下问题,不作更深入的探讨。
- JDK和Cglib动态代理,分别怎么使用
- JDK动态代理的原理
- Cglib动态代理的原理
- 为什么JDK动态代理一定要实现接口,而Cglib就不用?
- JDK和Cglib,本质上有什么区别?
一个简单的场景
- 一个Service接口,拥有sayHello()方法
- 一个ServiceImpl实现类,实现Service
- 创建一个ServiceImpl的代理类,代理sayHello()方法,在调用原方法的前后,打印锚点
例子如下
interface Service {
fun sayHello()
}
class ActualService : Service {
override fun sayHello() {
println("Hello, Java dynamic proxy...")
}
}
class MyHandler(private val service: Service) : InvocationHandler {
/**
* proxy: 生成的代理类
* method: 方法
* args: 方法参数
*/
override fun invoke(proxy: Any, method: Method, args: Array<out Any>?): Any? {
return if (method.name == "sayHello") {
println("调用方法前")
method.invoke(service).also {
println("调用方法后")
}
} else null
}
}
fun main() {
// 将生成的代理类进行打印
System.setProperty("jdk.proxy.ProxyGenerator.saveGeneratedFiles", "true")
val proxy = Proxy.newProxyInstance(
Service::class.java.classLoader,
arrayOf(Service::class.java),
MyHandler(ActualService())
)
(proxy as Service).sayHello()
}
总结一下,要点
- 被代理的类要实现接口
- 代理的逻辑要通过InvocationHandler实现
Proxy.newProxyInstance()
生成代理类,需要提供类加载器、被代理的接口、InvocationHandler
源码自己跟,最终会来到核心方法
-
java.lang.reflect.Proxy.ProxyBuilder#defineProxyClass
关键逻辑:生成类的字节码流;使用sun.misc.Unsafe直接从流创建Class对象。
private static Class<?> defineProxyClass(Module m, List<Class<?>> interfaces) { ... byte[] proxyClassFile = ProxyGenerator.generateProxyClass(proxyName, interfaces.toArray(EMPTY_CLASS_ARRAY), accessFlags); try { Class<?> pc = UNSAFE.defineClass(proxyName, proxyClassFile, 0, proxyClassFile.length, loader, null); return pc; } catch (ClassFormatError e) { ... } ... }
-
java.lang.reflect.ProxyGenerator#generateProxyClass(java.lang.String, java.lang.Class<?>[], int)
,这里可以看到这里是类字节码流生成的关键逻辑:凭空构建一个class流
- 常规class字节码文件的组成:魔数、版本号、常量池等
- 写入父类:固定为
"java/lang/reflect/Proxy"
- 写入需要被代理的接口,用户传入的
- 写入字段和方法,这其中包含了我们传入的InvocationHandler
ByteArrayOutputStream bout = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); DataOutputStream dout = new DataOutputStream(bout); dout.writeInt(0xCAFEBABE); // u2 minor_version; dout.writeShort(CLASSFILE_MINOR_VERSION); // u2 major_version; dout.writeShort(CLASSFILE_MAJOR_VERSION); cp.write(dout); // (write constant pool) // u2 access_flags; dout.writeShort(accessFlags); // u2 this_class; dout.writeShort(cp.getClass(dotToSlash(className))); // u2 super_class; dout.writeShort(cp.getClass(superclassName)); // u2 interfaces_count; dout.writeShort(interfaces.length); // u2 interfaces[interfaces_count]; for (Class<?> intf : interfaces) { dout.writeShort(cp.getClass( dotToSlash(intf.getName()))); } // u2 fields_count; dout.writeShort(fields.size()); // field_info fields[fields_count]; for (FieldInfo f : fields) { f.write(dout); } // u2 methods_count; dout.writeShort(methods.size()); // method_info methods[methods_count]; for (MethodInfo m : methods) { m.write(dout); } // u2 attributes_count; dout.writeShort(0); // (no ClassFile attributes for proxy classes)
通过设置系统属性:System.setProperty("jdk.proxy.ProxyGenerator.saveGeneratedFiles", "true")
可以将生成的字节码保存为文件,然后反编译看结果
package com.sun.proxy;
import com.gitee.floyd.proxy.Service;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;
import java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException;
public final class $Proxy0 extends Proxy implements Service {
private static Method m1;
private static Method m3;
private static Method m2;
private static Method m0;
public $Proxy0(InvocationHandler var1) throws {
super(var1);
}
public final boolean equals(Object var1) throws {
try {
return (Boolean)super.h.invoke(this, m1, new Object[]{var1});
} catch (RuntimeException | Error var3) {
throw var3;
} catch (Throwable var4) {
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(var4);
}
}
public final void sayHello() throws {
try {
super.h.invoke(this, m3, (Object[])null);
} catch (RuntimeException | Error var2) {
throw var2;
} catch (Throwable var3) {
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(var3);
}
}
public final String toString() throws {
try {
return (String)super.h.invoke(this, m2, (Object[])null);
} catch (RuntimeException | Error var2) {
throw var2;
} catch (Throwable var3) {
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(var3);
}
}
public final int hashCode() throws {
try {
return (Integer)super.h.invoke(this, m0, (Object[])null);
} catch (RuntimeException | Error var2) {
throw var2;
} catch (Throwable var3) {
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(var3);
}
}
static {
try {
m1 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("equals", Class.forName("java.lang.Object"));
m3 = Class.forName("com.gitee.floyd.proxy.Service").getMethod("sayHello");
m2 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("toString");
m0 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object").getMethod("hashCode");
} catch (NoSuchMethodException var2) {
throw new NoSuchMethodError(var2.getMessage());
} catch (ClassNotFoundException var3) {
throw new NoClassDefFoundError(var3.getMessage());
}
}
}
几个要点
- 该代理类直接继承了Proxy类,实现类我们指定的Service接口
sayHello()
代理的原理:调用InvocationHandler.invoke()
完成实际调用- 代理类的所有方法,都会调用
InvocationHandler.invoke()
JDK的动态代理,是从头构建新的类字节码流,然后加载到JVM中达成的。其使用方法必须依赖接口、InvocationHandler、Proxy,并不是非常方便。
类似上面,一个简单的场景
- 一个Service类,不用实现任何接口
- 创建Service的代理类,代理sayHello()方法,在调用原方法的前后,打印锚点
open class PersonService {
open fun sayHello(name: String): String {
return "Hello, $name"
}
}
fun tryMethodInterceptor() {
val enhancer = Enhancer()
enhancer.setSuperclass(PersonService::class.java)
enhancer.setCallback(MethodInterceptor { obj, method, args, proxy ->
if (method.name == "sayHello") {
println("我先执行一下")
proxy.invokeSuper(obj, args).also {
println("然后我再执行一下")
}
} else null
})
val proxy = enhancer.create() as PersonService
println(proxy.sayHello("你好"))
}
fun main() {
// 打印出生成的代理类
System.setProperty(DebuggingClassWriter.DEBUG_LOCATION_PROPERTY, "/Users/zouguodong/Code/Personal/play-floyd/proxy/generatedClass")
tryMethodInterceptor()
}
总结一下,要点
- 只需要被代理类自己,但被代理类和方法必须是open的,即可被继承和覆盖的
- 使用Enhancer类,方法拦截使用MethodInterceptor定义代理逻辑
同样,跟跟源码,发现关键逻辑在:net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer#generateClass
,这里是通过ASM库来生成类字节码的,过程比较复杂,需要对ASM API比较了解才能分析,这里这里暂时忽略。直接看生成的代码。
设置系统属性System.setProperty(DebuggingClassWriter.DEBUG_LOCATION_PROPERTY, "xxx")
可以将生成的代理类输出。
public class PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603 extends PersonService implements Factory {
private boolean CGLIB$BOUND;
public static Object CGLIB$FACTORY_DATA;
private static final ThreadLocal CGLIB$THREAD_CALLBACKS;
private static final Callback[] CGLIB$STATIC_CALLBACKS;
private MethodInterceptor CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
private static Object CGLIB$CALLBACK_FILTER;
private static final Method CGLIB$sayHello$0$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$sayHello$0$Proxy;
private static final Object[] CGLIB$emptyArgs;
private static final Method CGLIB$length$1$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$length$1$Proxy;
private static final Method CGLIB$equals$2$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$equals$2$Proxy;
private static final Method CGLIB$toString$3$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$toString$3$Proxy;
private static final Method CGLIB$hashCode$4$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$hashCode$4$Proxy;
private static final Method CGLIB$clone$5$Method;
private static final MethodProxy CGLIB$clone$5$Proxy;
static void CGLIB$STATICHOOK1() {
CGLIB$THREAD_CALLBACKS = new ThreadLocal();
CGLIB$emptyArgs = new Object[0];
Class var0 = Class.forName("com.gitee.floyd.proxy.PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603");
Class var1;
Method[] var10000 = ReflectUtils.findMethods(new String[]{"equals", "(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z", "toString", "()Ljava/lang/String;", "hashCode", "()I", "clone", "()Ljava/lang/Object;"}, (var1 = Class.forName("java.lang.Object")).getDeclaredMethods());
CGLIB$equals$2$Method = var10000[0];
CGLIB$equals$2$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z", "equals", "CGLIB$equals$2");
CGLIB$toString$3$Method = var10000[1];
CGLIB$toString$3$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "()Ljava/lang/String;", "toString", "CGLIB$toString$3");
CGLIB$hashCode$4$Method = var10000[2];
CGLIB$hashCode$4$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "()I", "hashCode", "CGLIB$hashCode$4");
CGLIB$clone$5$Method = var10000[3];
CGLIB$clone$5$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "()Ljava/lang/Object;", "clone", "CGLIB$clone$5");
var10000 = ReflectUtils.findMethods(new String[]{"sayHello", "(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;", "length", "(Ljava/lang/String;)I"}, (var1 = Class.forName("com.gitee.floyd.proxy.PersonService")).getDeclaredMethods());
CGLIB$sayHello$0$Method = var10000[0];
CGLIB$sayHello$0$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;", "sayHello", "CGLIB$sayHello$0");
CGLIB$length$1$Method = var10000[1];
CGLIB$length$1$Proxy = MethodProxy.create(var1, var0, "(Ljava/lang/String;)I", "length", "CGLIB$length$1");
}
final String CGLIB$sayHello$0(String var1) {
return super.sayHello(var1);
}
public final String sayHello(String var1) {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
return var10000 != null ? (String)var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$sayHello$0$Method, new Object[]{var1}, CGLIB$sayHello$0$Proxy) : super.sayHello(var1);
}
final int CGLIB$length$1(String var1) {
return super.length(var1);
}
public final int length(String var1) {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
if (var10000 != null) {
Object var2 = var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$length$1$Method, new Object[]{var1}, CGLIB$length$1$Proxy);
return var2 == null ? 0 : ((Number)var2).intValue();
} else {
return super.length(var1);
}
}
final boolean CGLIB$equals$2(Object var1) {
return super.equals(var1);
}
public final boolean equals(Object var1) {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
if (var10000 != null) {
Object var2 = var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$equals$2$Method, new Object[]{var1}, CGLIB$equals$2$Proxy);
return var2 == null ? false : (Boolean)var2;
} else {
return super.equals(var1);
}
}
final String CGLIB$toString$3() {
return super.toString();
}
public final String toString() {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
return var10000 != null ? (String)var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$toString$3$Method, CGLIB$emptyArgs, CGLIB$toString$3$Proxy) : super.toString();
}
final int CGLIB$hashCode$4() {
return super.hashCode();
}
public final int hashCode() {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
if (var10000 != null) {
Object var1 = var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$hashCode$4$Method, CGLIB$emptyArgs, CGLIB$hashCode$4$Proxy);
return var1 == null ? 0 : ((Number)var1).intValue();
} else {
return super.hashCode();
}
}
final Object CGLIB$clone$5() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
return super.clone();
}
protected final Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
MethodInterceptor var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
if (var10000 == null) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
}
return var10000 != null ? var10000.intercept(this, CGLIB$clone$5$Method, CGLIB$emptyArgs, CGLIB$clone$5$Proxy) : super.clone();
}
public static MethodProxy CGLIB$findMethodProxy(Signature var0) {
String var10000 = var0.toString();
switch(var10000.hashCode()) {
case -1816210712:
if (var10000.equals("sayHello(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;")) {
return CGLIB$sayHello$0$Proxy;
}
break;
case -508378822:
if (var10000.equals("clone()Ljava/lang/Object;")) {
return CGLIB$clone$5$Proxy;
}
break;
case 166945484:
if (var10000.equals("length(Ljava/lang/String;)I")) {
return CGLIB$length$1$Proxy;
}
break;
case 1826985398:
if (var10000.equals("equals(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z")) {
return CGLIB$equals$2$Proxy;
}
break;
case 1913648695:
if (var10000.equals("toString()Ljava/lang/String;")) {
return CGLIB$toString$3$Proxy;
}
break;
case 1984935277:
if (var10000.equals("hashCode()I")) {
return CGLIB$hashCode$4$Proxy;
}
}
return null;
}
public PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603() {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
}
public static void CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS(Callback[] var0) {
CGLIB$THREAD_CALLBACKS.set(var0);
}
public static void CGLIB$SET_STATIC_CALLBACKS(Callback[] var0) {
CGLIB$STATIC_CALLBACKS = var0;
}
private static final void CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(Object var0) {
PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603 var1 = (PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603)var0;
if (!var1.CGLIB$BOUND) {
var1.CGLIB$BOUND = true;
Object var10000 = CGLIB$THREAD_CALLBACKS.get();
if (var10000 == null) {
var10000 = CGLIB$STATIC_CALLBACKS;
if (var10000 == null) {
return;
}
}
var1.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0 = (MethodInterceptor)((Callback[])var10000)[0];
}
}
public Object newInstance(Callback[] var1) {
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS(var1);
PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603 var10000 = new PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603();
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS((Callback[])null);
return var10000;
}
public Object newInstance(Callback var1) {
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS(new Callback[]{var1});
PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603 var10000 = new PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603();
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS((Callback[])null);
return var10000;
}
public Object newInstance(Class[] var1, Object[] var2, Callback[] var3) {
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS(var3);
PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603 var10000 = new PersonService$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$470f9603;
switch(var1.length) {
case 0:
var10000.<init>();
CGLIB$SET_THREAD_CALLBACKS((Callback[])null);
return var10000;
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Constructor not found");
}
}
public Callback getCallback(int var1) {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
MethodInterceptor var10000;
switch(var1) {
case 0:
var10000 = this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0;
break;
default:
var10000 = null;
}
return var10000;
}
public void setCallback(int var1, Callback var2) {
switch(var1) {
case 0:
this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0 = (MethodInterceptor)var2;
default:
}
}
public Callback[] getCallbacks() {
CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS(this);
return new Callback[]{this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0};
}
public void setCallbacks(Callback[] var1) {
this.CGLIB$CALLBACK_0 = (MethodInterceptor)var1[0];
}
static {
CGLIB$STATICHOOK1();
}
}
看到
- 生成的代理类直接继承了
Service
类 - 方法拦截都是通过
MethodInterceptor
- 构建
MethodProxy
传入,用于真实方法的调用。
注意:MethodInterceptor
中如果直接调用Method,会造成堆栈溢出。必须通过MethodProxy.invokeSuper()
方法调用才行。
CGlib是基于ASM进行字节码生成的,在使用上会简单很多。
可以看到,无论是JDK动态代理,还是CGlib,最终都是生成了代理类的字节码,并将其加载为新的类。从这个角度上看,貌似没啥区别呀?理论上,JDK的动态代理也可以设计成CGlib那样,直接基于类生成代理子类,就像有人做的那样。很多人说,JDK动态代理只能基于接口,是因为代理类继承了Proxy,而Java是单继承,没有办法再继承用户自定义类,我认为这个说法因果倒置了,都说了,如果想要继承自定义类,是能够办到的。对于这个问题,我的看法是JDK设计者故意为之,至于原因嘛,我也不大说得上来(说到底,还是菜)。
JDK代理和CGlib代理的区别,除了API使用上,更重要的是字节码生成方式上的区别:前者凭空生成;后者使用ASM基于被代理类生成。
都是生成,区别在于生成的效率以及生成的代理类的效率。这又涉及到谁效率高的问题了。用JMH大概试一试吧。我们用几乎一样的被代理类,生成代理类,调用方法。测试每个操作所耗费的时间。
///////////////////////CGlib的测试case
open class PersonService {
open fun sayHello() {}
}
fun tryMethodInterceptor() {
val enhancer = Enhancer()
enhancer.setSuperclass(PersonService::class.java)
enhancer.setCallback(MethodInterceptor { obj, method, args, proxy ->
if (method.name == "sayHello") {
proxy.invokeSuper(obj, args)
} else null
})
(enhancer.create() as PersonService).sayHello()
}
///////////////////////JDK的测试CASE
interface Service {
fun sayHello()
}
class ActualService : Service {
override fun sayHello() { }
}
class MyHandler(private val service: Service) : InvocationHandler {
override fun invoke(proxy: Any, method: Method, args: Array<out Any>?): Any? {
return if (method.name == "sayHello") {
method.invoke(service)
} else null
}
}
fun testJDKProxy() {
val proxy = Proxy.newProxyInstance(
Service::class.java.classLoader,
arrayOf(Service::class.java),
MyHandler(ActualService())
)
(proxy as Service).sayHello()
}
///////////////////////测试代码:测试各执行100次,平均每次耗时多少
@Fork(1)
@Threads(10)
@Warmup(iterations = 1)
@State(Scope.Benchmark)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
open class JMHWarm {
@Param("100")
var count: Int = 0
@Benchmark
fun testJDK() {
for (i in 1..count) {
testJDKProxy()
}
}
@Benchmark
fun testCGlib() {
for (i in 1..count) {
tryMethodInterceptor()
}
}
}
fun main() {
val option = OptionsBuilder()
.include(JMHWarm::class.simpleName)
.resultFormat(ResultFormatType.JSON)
.build()
Runner(option).run()
}
对于上面的case,当只保留代理类创建逻辑时,测试结果
Benchmark (count) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
JMHWarm.testCGlib 100 avgt 5 0.001 ± 0.001 ms/op
JMHWarm.testJDK 100 avgt 5 0.004 ± 0.002 ms/op
当同时保留创建和方法调用逻辑时,测试结果
Benchmark (count) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
JMHWarm.testCGlib 100 avgt 5 0.028 ± 0.002 ms/op
JMHWarm.testJDK 100 avgt 5 0.006 ± 0.001 ms/op
当前这样的基准测试是不准确的,但还是大致可以得出代理类的创建CGlib比JDK快,但调用上JDK更快。快多少?快不了多少。
按照本文的方式来探索动态代理,还是远远不够的,要想把这一块理解透彻,说到底,还是要对JVM有深入的研究,也就是说,还需要继续探索的点
-
ASM库的使用、深入理解
-
类加载的深入研究,ClassLoader类的剖析
-
sun.misc.Unsafe类的深入研究
-
JVM的深入研究