You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your paper, you seem to use the original PMI matrix as the signal matrix of word2vec. However, in Omer's paper, their conclusion points to the signal matrix PMI-log(k), where the k is the num of negative sampling.
Could you tell me is there a reason to choose PMI instead of PMI-log(k)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In your paper, you seem to use the original PMI matrix as the signal matrix of word2vec. However, in Omer's paper, their conclusion points to the signal matrix PMI-log(k), where the k is the num of negative sampling.
Could you tell me is there a reason to choose PMI instead of PMI-log(k)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: