You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just found hubfs, and it seems promising to help people not normally using git... but I'm not sure it would work in my use-case, and I can't find any docs about it.
We are utilizing an old program that makes hundreds of data-files while operation are ongoing. All of these data-files are somehow linked together, and if just one of the data-files are not of the current version the program crashes. :-( If the program is shut down correctly, then we know all files are valid.
For this reason, I'm unsure if hubfs would be compatible with it, as I'm unsure about when exactly files are committed to the repository.
So my questions are:
Are each change to a file triggering a commit of that file?
If not, then are a number of file-changes within a time-period triggering a commit of those files?
Would it be possible to somehow only trigger a commit of all changed files when we know it's safe to do so?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just found hubfs, and it seems promising to help people not normally using git... but I'm not sure it would work in my use-case, and I can't find any docs about it.
We are utilizing an old program that makes hundreds of data-files while operation are ongoing. All of these data-files are somehow linked together, and if just one of the data-files are not of the current version the program crashes. :-( If the program is shut down correctly, then we know all files are valid.
For this reason, I'm unsure if hubfs would be compatible with it, as I'm unsure about when exactly files are committed to the repository.
So my questions are:
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: