Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of browserify is breaking the build 🚨 #20

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

An in-range update of browserify is breaking the build 🚨 #20

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 8, 2019

The devDependency browserify was updated from 16.3.0 to 16.4.0.

🚨 View failing branch.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

browserify is a devDependency of this project. It might not break your production code or affect downstream projects, but probably breaks your build or test tools, which may prevent deploying or publishing.

Status Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push: The Travis CI build could not complete due to an error (Details).

Commits

The new version differs by 5 commits.

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 8, 2019

After pinning to 16.3.0 your tests are passing again. Downgrade this dependency 📌.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 9, 2019

  • The devDependency browserify was updated from 16.4.0 to 16.5.0.

Your tests are passing again with this update. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

  • 506533c 16.5.0
  • 85489cc Update changelog.markdown
  • 4c04949 Merge pull request #1918 from browserify/custom-browser-field
  • 8213b64 Support custom names for "browser" field resolution

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants