Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generic Cluster API provider instead of specific instances #162

Open
ncdc opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

Generic Cluster API provider instead of specific instances #162

ncdc opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ncdc
Copy link

ncdc commented Aug 21, 2020

Would it be possible to combine capa_provider and capv_provider to a more generic cluster_api_provider? Having specific providers for specific Cluster API infrastructure providers means you have to add new providers to the language for Azure, GCP, etc.

@vladimirvivien
Copy link
Contributor

@ncdc yes, that crossed my mind. After implementing the CAPA and CAPV it looks like a generic CAPI maybe what is needed.

@ncdc
Copy link
Author

ncdc commented Aug 24, 2020

Where you potentially could add some provider-specific logic would be for accessing the remote host, as some clouds have APIs that let you do this securely instead of using SSH. But even then, you could probably do that by injecting a connector, such as cluster_api_provider(..., connector=aws_ssm())

@vladimirvivien
Copy link
Contributor

@srm09 ^^^

@ykakarap ykakarap self-assigned this Sep 25, 2020
@ncdc
Copy link
Author

ncdc commented Oct 21, 2020

@ykakarap I'm wondering if you've put together any ideas for this? Thanks!

@ykakarap
Copy link

Hi @ncdc , @vladimirvivien and I had a few discussions around this. We are looking at what needs to be done to achieve this and do not have it completely formalized.

@srm09
Copy link
Contributor

srm09 commented Nov 24, 2021

Is the plan to continue down this route? Was hoping to get a capz_provider() implemented, does it make sense to open another issue for that one?

@vladimirvivien
Copy link
Contributor

@srm09 the plan is to investigate/create a generic capi-provider that can enumerate its machines. But if investigation reveals that is not doable, then we could stay on the current course.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants