You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the ToResult method on Maybe returns a success result if the Maybe has a value, and a failure result if there is no value.
But what if it should be the other way around?
Lets say I want to create a report, but only if no report already exists.
Right now I would probably do something like this:
await Result
.Success().Map(()=> service.FindAsync(id))//returns Report?.Ensure(report => report isnull,"There is already a report available.").Tap(_ => service.CreateReport())
...
But this comes with some overhead because I have to start the chain with an empty success result to then map the nullable value and ensure its null using the Ensure method.
I think it would be more appropriate and compact to use Maybe and its ToResult method since I'm dealing with a nullable.
But to keep the chain running if the Maybe has no value, I basically need an inverted ToResult method that returns a success result if there is no value. E.g:
await Maybe
.From(service.FindAsync(id)).ToInvertedResult("There is already a report available.")//returns success result if Maybe has no value, otherwise returns failure result with error message.Tap(()=> service.CreateReport())
...
What do you think about this addition?
ToInvertedResult is just an example name because I can't think of anything better. 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the
ToResult
method onMaybe
returns a success result if theMaybe
has a value, and a failure result if there is no value.But what if it should be the other way around?
Lets say I want to create a report, but only if no report already exists.
Right now I would probably do something like this:
But this comes with some overhead because I have to start the chain with an empty success result to then map the nullable value and ensure its
null
using theEnsure
method.I think it would be more appropriate and compact to use
Maybe
and itsToResult
method since I'm dealing with a nullable.But to keep the chain running if the
Maybe
has no value, I basically need an invertedToResult
method that returns a success result if there is no value. E.g:What do you think about this addition?
ToInvertedResult
is just an example name because I can't think of anything better. 😄The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: