Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

same peptide seq but different STY localization probability of same Serine amino acid #1234

Open
singhsk2622 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@singhsk2622
Copy link

singhsk2622 commented Oct 30, 2024

dia_nn_sty
Hi, I did phospho analysis in Fragpipe-DIA-NN.
I see one strange thing in output file. I see that for same protein there 3 STY peptides has been identified. All three peptides have same sequence only difference in localization probability of same Serine amino acid. why it is assigning three different peptides and assigning in different rows? Any one explain it me?

@vdemichev
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Can you please paste here the whole rows you are showing along with column names?

Best,
Vadim

@singhsk2622
Copy link
Author

<style> </style>
Protein.Group Protein.Ids Protein.Names Genes First.Protein.Description Proteotypic Stripped.Sequence Modified.Sequence Precursor.Charge Precursor.Id E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H2_ANP_Slot2-33_1_4351.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H1_CTRL_Slot2-28_1_4341.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H5_CNP_Slot2-41_1_4367.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H6_CNP_Slot2-44_1_4373.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H1_CNP_Slot2-29_1_4343.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H6_ANP_Slot2-45_1_4375.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H2_CNP_Slot2-32_1_4349.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H5_ANP_Slot2-42_1_4369.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H11_ANP_Slot2-30_1_4345.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H2_CTRL_Slot2-31_1_4347.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H4_ANP_Slot2-39_1_4363.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H5_CTRL_Slot2-40_1_4365.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H3_CTRL_Slot2-34_1_4353.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H3_ANP_Slot2-36_1_4357.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H6_CTRL_Slot2-43_1_4371.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H4_CNP_Slot2-38_1_4361.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H4_CTRL_Slot2-37_1_4359.d E:\DATA\Mette_sty_4343-4375\H3_CNP_Slot2-35_1_4355.d All Mapped Proteins All Mapped Genes M:15.9949 M:15.9949 Best Localization M:15.9949 Best Scan STY:79.96633 STY:79.96633 Best Localization STY:79.96633 Best Scan n:42.0106 n:42.0106 Best Localization n:42.0106 Best Scan
F1M6Z4 F1M6Z4   Prob1   1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGMR AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R 2 AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R2 4743.61 1802.44 620.495 1679.9 3714.83 2351.35 2216.74 1634.64 4171.05 2327.22 1572.71 593.243 616.555 2498.75   2767.73 1533.18   tr|F1M6Z4|F1M6Z4_RAT Prob1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGM(1.0000)R 1 H1_CNP_Slot2-29_1_4343_diatracer.815118.815118.2 AAS(0.8971)APPT(0.0277)DRLHPAS(0.0379)S(0.0373)LGMR 0.8971 H1_CNP_Slot2-29_1_4343_diatracer.815118.815118.2
F1M6Z4 F1M6Z4   Prob1   1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGMR AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R 3 AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R3 172206 54009.6 53949.4 99303.2 148441 120861 118466 78399.5 165968 118161 93134.4 72153.6 52809.7 103080 81127.9 127826 70269.4 64540.8 tr|F1M6Z4|F1M6Z4_RAT Prob1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGM(1.0000)R 1 H11_ANP_Slot2-30_1_4345_diatracer.1040581.1040581.3 AAS(0.9302)APPT(0.0222)DRLHPAS(0.0239)S(0.0238)LGMR 0.9302 H4_CTRL_Slot2-37_1_4359_diatracer.782931.782931.3
F1M6Z4 F1M6Z4   Prob1   1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGMR AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R 4 AAS(UniMod:21)APPTDRLHPASSLGM(UniMod:35)R4 3602.33     8367.68 3951.48 6857.46   5254.43 3482.65   3302.2               tr|F1M6Z4|F1M6Z4_RAT Prob1 AASAPPTDRLHPASSLGM(1.0000)R 1 H5_ANP_Slot2-42_1_4369_diatracer.447942.447942.4 AAS(0.7913)APPT(0.0971)DRLHPAS(0.0391)S(0.0725)LGMR 0.7913 H5_ANP_Slot2-42_1_4369_diatracer.447942.447942.4

@vdemichev
Copy link
Owner

Charge states are different

@singhsk2622
Copy link
Author

Should not be merged in final file? now when i am doing statistical analysis so i will have 3 different fold change for three same peptides with different charge. Any suggestion for this ?

@vdemichev
Copy link
Owner

You can either aggregate yourself based on the main report or (if using DIA-NN 1.9 or later) use the phosphosite_90/99 matrices, how these are calculated is described here https://github.com/vdemichev/DiaNN?tab=readme-ov-file#ptms-and-peptidoforms.

@singhsk2622
Copy link
Author

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants